Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4201 - 4210 of 17421 for Cost.
Search results 4201 - 4210 of 17421 for Cost.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the stipulated amount of $575 and costs. ¶9 The court found that “the backyard of the Jacobitz property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78507 - 2014-09-15
in the stipulated amount of $575 and costs. ¶9 The court found that “the backyard of the Jacobitz property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78507 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Drug court practitioner fact sheet: Selecting and using risk and need assessments
things being equal, the “best” measure will cost less and take the least time to complete while
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/factsheetriskassessment.pdf - 2021-09-23
things being equal, the “best” measure will cost less and take the least time to complete while
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/factsheetriskassessment.pdf - 2021-09-23
Northland Whitehall Apartments Limited Partnership v. City of Whitehall Board of Review
, the appraiser having concluded that (1) the buildings’ age militated against the cost approach, and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21521 - 2006-04-25
, the appraiser having concluded that (1) the buildings’ age militated against the cost approach, and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21521 - 2006-04-25
Lyman Lumber of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Yourchuck Video, Inc.
$26,264.53. Yourchuck disputed the extra costs, contending it did not approve them or they were already
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7272 - 2005-03-31
$26,264.53. Yourchuck disputed the extra costs, contending it did not approve them or they were already
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7272 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lyman Lumber of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Yourchuck Video, Inc.
totaling $26,264.53. Yourchuck No. 04-0279 3 disputed the extra costs, contending it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7272 - 2017-09-20
totaling $26,264.53. Yourchuck No. 04-0279 3 disputed the extra costs, contending it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7272 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
a verdict in excess of $109,000, the only estimate of the cost of the pool replacement. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58003 - 2014-09-15
a verdict in excess of $109,000, the only estimate of the cost of the pool replacement. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58003 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
' reinstatement petition. We direct Attorney Parks to pay the full costs of this reinstatement proceeding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=334393 - 2021-02-15
' reinstatement petition. We direct Attorney Parks to pay the full costs of this reinstatement proceeding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=334393 - 2021-02-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
law. We also find it appropriate to require him to pay the full costs of this proceeding, which
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105948 - 2017-09-21
law. We also find it appropriate to require him to pay the full costs of this proceeding, which
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105948 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
of his license to practice law. We also find it appropriate to require him to pay the full costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105948 - 2013-12-18
of his license to practice law. We also find it appropriate to require him to pay the full costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105948 - 2013-12-18
[PDF]
WI 44
for the reinstatement of his license. Finally, we order that Attorney Burkert pay the costs of this disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010469 - 2025-09-12
for the reinstatement of his license. Finally, we order that Attorney Burkert pay the costs of this disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010469 - 2025-09-12