Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4201 - 4210 of 67037 for ct.

Daniel S. Stasiewicz v. Juan Pagan, Jr.
. Appeal No. 01-1101 Cir. Ct. No. 99 CV 2840 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3882 - 2005-03-31

Justin Pichler v. United States Fire Insurance Company
, 313, 558 N.W.2d 881, 882 (Ct. App. 1996). “Ministerial acts, on the other hand, are not generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14002 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Michael M. Longcore
600, 605 n.2, 558 N.W.2d 696, 698 n.2 (Ct. App. 1996). Detaining a motorist for a routine traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14556 - 2017-09-21

Nicole R. Walton v. The Home Indemnity Corporation
methodology as the trial court. Hoglund v. Secura Ins., 176 Wis.2d 265, 268, 500 N.W.2d 354, 355 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8745 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Allan B. Levin v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
. Ct. No. 02-CV-871 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS ALLAN B. LEVIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5597 - 2017-09-19

Daniel S. Stasiewicz v. Juan Pagan, Jr.
. Appeal No. 01-1101 Cir. Ct. No. 99 CV 2840 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3881 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Charles R. Wincek
797, 285 N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App. 1979). 3 There is no transcript of the November 21, 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11804 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Waukesha County v. Markus Meinhardt
, 593 N.W.2d 412 (Ct. App. 1999). A brief detention, however, is not unreasonable if it is justified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3547 - 2017-09-19

State v. Karl H. Amenson
. Appeal No. 02-1649 Cir. Ct. No. 98-CF-1121 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5381 - 2005-03-31

State v. Robert W. Sweat
, 907-08 (Ct. App. 1990). We will affirm that decision if the court "examined the relevant facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9391 - 2005-03-31