Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4201 - 4210 of 69658 for had.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the shooting and had testified at Jackson’s revocation hearing. The witness was the victim’s ex- girlfriend
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542879 - 2022-07-13

[PDF] State v. Harold R. Altenburg
an erroneous pre- trial ruling and jury instruction had kept the real controversy from being tried. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10690 - 2017-09-20

State v. Scott A. Defere
, at which point he made contact with two more witnesses who informed him that they had heard a loud crash
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5941 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Essex Insurance Company v. James Manley
submissions presented no evidence establishing that it had relied on his misrepresentations when issuing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3375 - 2017-09-19

State v. Robert J. Turicik
on a Friday night at approximately 10:45 p.m. Maples had observed Turicik's car traveling with only one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10003 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Maurice Clark
2 cites as error the trial court’s admission of two threatening letters Clark had written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12328 - 2014-09-15

State v. Wesley S. Leonard
exercised its discretion. We conclude that the trial court had authority to grant Leonard relief from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14961 - 2005-03-31

Essex Insurance Company v. James Manley
submissions presented no evidence establishing that it had relied on his misrepresentations when issuing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3375 - 2005-03-31

Sheboygan County v. John J. V.
and that Milwaukee County had indicated that it would take four or five days to retrieve and compile the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26576 - 2006-09-26

John Riegleman v. State of Wisconsin Chiropractic Examining Board
by the administrative law judge. The circuit court concluded that the Board had prejudged Riegleman’s case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4359 - 2005-03-31