Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42001 - 42010 of 76552 for judgment for u s.
Search results 42001 - 42010 of 76552 for judgment for u s.
Belinda Snopek v. Lakeland Medical Center
precedent. Lakeland then filed a motion for summary judgment. Lakeland asserted that the notice statute
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17198 - 2005-03-31
precedent. Lakeland then filed a motion for summary judgment. Lakeland asserted that the notice statute
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17198 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. And [Bouc] couldn’t get over the fact that those could not be used—in my judgment—against her, against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58051 - 2014-09-15
. And [Bouc] couldn’t get over the fact that those could not be used—in my judgment—against her, against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58051 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 37
. Butler and Mr. Addison engaged in physical contact with [D.P.] in such a manner that [D.P.'s] safety
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80476 - 2014-09-15
. Butler and Mr. Addison engaged in physical contact with [D.P.] in such a manner that [D.P.'s] safety
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80476 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to vacate his judgment of conviction, conclude he received ineffective assistance, or grant his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=575407 - 2022-10-12
to vacate his judgment of conviction, conclude he received ineffective assistance, or grant his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=575407 - 2022-10-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with improper credibility determinations,” and it “completely disregard[s] key and relevant facts.” For all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=369914 - 2021-05-25
with improper credibility determinations,” and it “completely disregard[s] key and relevant facts.” For all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=369914 - 2021-05-25
[PDF]
Frontsheet
not this Referee. The judgment that is asked to be made is an intuitive one, based upon observation of witnesses
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213299 - 2018-05-24
not this Referee. The judgment that is asked to be made is an intuitive one, based upon observation of witnesses
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213299 - 2018-05-24
2010 WI APP 36
). We do not substitute our judgment for the Commission’s in considering the weight or credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46203 - 2010-03-30
). We do not substitute our judgment for the Commission’s in considering the weight or credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46203 - 2010-03-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determined in the order or judgment sought to be reconsidered”). We agree with the State and, thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=383393 - 2021-07-07
determined in the order or judgment sought to be reconsidered”). We agree with the State and, thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=383393 - 2021-07-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable, and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256036 - 2020-03-10
was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable, and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256036 - 2020-03-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“[S]tatutory interpretation ‘begins with the language of the statute. If the meaning of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1048331 - 2025-12-09
“[S]tatutory interpretation ‘begins with the language of the statute. If the meaning of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1048331 - 2025-12-09