Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42011 - 42020 of 58991 for quit claim deed.
Search results 42011 - 42020 of 58991 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
State v. James I. Montroy
convictions. ¶5 At a May 17, 2004, motion hearing, Montroy’s counsel 1 claimed that the court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19432 - 2017-09-21
convictions. ¶5 At a May 17, 2004, motion hearing, Montroy’s counsel 1 claimed that the court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19432 - 2017-09-21
State v. Gary L. Parson
could not credibly claim to be unaffected by these relationships.[1] At a minimum, an appearance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11953 - 2005-03-31
could not credibly claim to be unaffected by these relationships.[1] At a minimum, an appearance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11953 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
established.” They later filed claims against the estate, asserting “there is no proven or established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143756 - 2015-06-29
established.” They later filed claims against the estate, asserting “there is no proven or established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143756 - 2015-06-29
State v. Julian Andersen
and order and remand the matter for resentencing. We address Andersen’s multiplicity claims first. Charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13205 - 2005-03-31
and order and remand the matter for resentencing. We address Andersen’s multiplicity claims first. Charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13205 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
raises four claims on appeal: (1) the trial court should not have allowed the State’s witness to read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49473 - 2010-04-28
raises four claims on appeal: (1) the trial court should not have allowed the State’s witness to read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49473 - 2010-04-28
COURT OF APPEALS
of the children to terminate parental rights.[3] Robert claims that termination based on § 48.415(7), as applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36247 - 2009-04-20
of the children to terminate parental rights.[3] Robert claims that termination based on § 48.415(7), as applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36247 - 2009-04-20
Pamela R. Obey v. Thomas J. Halloin, M.D.
on the basis of Ball's conduct in another Brown County circuit court case. Ball claims that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15439 - 2005-03-31
on the basis of Ball's conduct in another Brown County circuit court case. Ball claims that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15439 - 2005-03-31
Eugene Henry Williamson v. Steco Sales, Inc.
for a ten-month term ending on February 1, 1991. As indicated, Williamson claimed that Haka and Jerzak
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10826 - 2005-03-31
for a ten-month term ending on February 1, 1991. As indicated, Williamson claimed that Haka and Jerzak
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10826 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
there is any arguable merit to a claim the court failed to comply with mandatory time limits, thereby losing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120984 - 2014-09-01
there is any arguable merit to a claim the court failed to comply with mandatory time limits, thereby losing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120984 - 2014-09-01
State v. Steven A. Wienke
resolution that issue on which it is necessary to set aside the judgment of conviction. Wienke claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10008 - 2005-03-31
resolution that issue on which it is necessary to set aside the judgment of conviction. Wienke claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10008 - 2005-03-31