Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42021 - 42030 of 68339 for law.

Donald J. Anderson v. County of Douglas
of material factual disputes and a right to judgment as a matter of law. Powalka v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8961 - 2005-03-31

WI App 63 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1582-CR Complete Title...
. § 973.015, the statute governing expunction. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96064 - 2013-05-28

COURT OF APPEALS
. He refers to the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur and to the elements of a common law negligence claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105801 - 2013-12-18

COURT OF APPEALS
forth by the defendant constitutes a ‘new factor’ is a question of law.” Id. Second, “if a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80278 - 2012-04-02

State v. Michael P. Schoenberg
to provide information of that sort to the jury, for it creates a presumption. As a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15610 - 2005-03-31

State v. Irvon L. Crawford
and statutory standards is a question of law subject to de novo review by this court. See id. The essential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12647 - 2005-03-31

2010 WI APP 7
of The Law Office of Michael Shannon Murphy, Janesville. 2010 WI App 7 COURT OF APPEALS DECISION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44952 - 2010-01-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ¶18, 336 Wis. 2d 358, 805 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131977 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Quincy Ferguson
, it presents a question of law subject to our independent review. State v. Dodd, 185 Wis.2d 560, 564, 518
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8164 - 2017-09-19

State v. Patrick D. O'Donnell
its discretion if it misapplies or relies upon an erroneous view of the law. See State v. Anderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14878 - 2005-03-31