Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42021 - 42030 of 82603 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.

State v. Randolph S. Miller
. APPEAL from judgments and an order of the circuit court for Waupaca County: jOHN P. HOFFMAN, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5552 - 2005-03-31

State v. Randolph S. Miller
. APPEAL from judgments and an order of the circuit court for Waupaca County: jOHN P. HOFFMAN, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5555 - 2005-03-31

State v. Randolph S. Miller
. APPEAL from judgments and an order of the circuit court for Waupaca County: jOHN P. HOFFMAN, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5558 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
., Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26853 - 2006-10-18

[PDF] NOTICE
and an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26853 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: JEFFREY A. CONEN, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107365 - 2017-09-21

Daniel Ray Sharp v. Robert G. Vick
uses. In August, the plaintiffs became suspicious and obtained their own tests of the water. Those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5349 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Daniel Ray Sharp v. Robert G. Vick
, the plaintiffs became suspicious and obtained their own tests of the water. Those tests showed the water
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5349 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Ronald G. Sorenson
attempt to resolve the matter, for two reasons. First, we may not apply a discretionary test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14713 - 2017-09-21

State v. Ronald G. Sorenson
to resolve the matter, for two reasons. First, we may not apply a discretionary test in the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14713 - 2005-03-31