Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42071 - 42080 of 59327 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 42071 - 42080 of 59327 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Jeanne G. Frawley v. Edward L. Frawley
claims that it is undisputed that, during the marriage, the parties used non-salary distributions from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6910 - 2005-03-31
claims that it is undisputed that, during the marriage, the parties used non-salary distributions from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6910 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey S. Amerson
to render him incapable of safely driving. It is claimed that the amount of alcohol consumed by Mr. Amerson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12081 - 2005-03-31
to render him incapable of safely driving. It is claimed that the amount of alcohol consumed by Mr. Amerson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12081 - 2005-03-31
State v. Leigh A. Pedretti
.2d 191, 195, 251 N.W.2d 28, 31 (1977). When a party claims that he or she is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12028 - 2005-03-31
.2d 191, 195, 251 N.W.2d 28, 31 (1977). When a party claims that he or she is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12028 - 2005-03-31
State v. Billy J. Doudna
the guarantee of equal protection and subjects him to double jeopardy. We reject each claim and affirm. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6406 - 2005-03-31
the guarantee of equal protection and subjects him to double jeopardy. We reject each claim and affirm. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6406 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to disclose, was not “material” for purposes of Wessel’s constitutional claim. Wessel appeals the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144477 - 2015-07-15
to disclose, was not “material” for purposes of Wessel’s constitutional claim. Wessel appeals the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144477 - 2015-07-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.” Here, the P.O.D. documents were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123397 - 2014-10-07
a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.” Here, the P.O.D. documents were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123397 - 2014-10-07
Tecumseh Products Company v. American Employers Insurance Company
judgment claiming that the trial court’s previous decision that the release of PCBs into the environment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11933 - 2009-03-23
judgment claiming that the trial court’s previous decision that the release of PCBs into the environment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11933 - 2009-03-23
State v. Michael Daniels
his postconviction motion. Daniels claims that the trial court improperly denied his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9988 - 2005-03-31
his postconviction motion. Daniels claims that the trial court improperly denied his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9988 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
C.J.S. Searches § 309 (West 2012) (where a claim of an illegal seizure rests on the contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82806 - 2012-05-22
C.J.S. Searches § 309 (West 2012) (where a claim of an illegal seizure rests on the contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82806 - 2012-05-22
COURT OF APPEALS
as a sixth offense. He claims that the circuit court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75462 - 2011-12-19
as a sixth offense. He claims that the circuit court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75462 - 2011-12-19