Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42071 - 42080 of 57351 for id.
Search results 42071 - 42080 of 57351 for id.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
definitional meaning.” Id. “In construing or interpreting a statute the court is not at liberty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644620 - 2023-04-13
definitional meaning.” Id. “In construing or interpreting a statute the court is not at liberty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644620 - 2023-04-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was not negligent. See id., ¶22 (“A person is negligent when [he or she] fails to exercise ordinary care
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95625 - 2014-09-15
was not negligent. See id., ¶22 (“A person is negligent when [he or she] fails to exercise ordinary care
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95625 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for a proper exercise of discretion. See id., ¶38. Our review of the record satisfies us that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717210 - 2023-10-24
for a proper exercise of discretion. See id., ¶38. Our review of the record satisfies us that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717210 - 2023-10-24
[PDF]
State v. Brian K. Rundle
not rely on the false alibi in lieu of evidence placing Peters at the scene of the crime. Id. at 30-31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13805 - 2014-09-15
not rely on the false alibi in lieu of evidence placing Peters at the scene of the crime. Id. at 30-31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13805 - 2014-09-15
State v. Larry E. Thomas
and a conclusion based on a logical rationale founded upon proper legal standards. Id. at 277. A strong public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7118 - 2005-03-31
and a conclusion based on a logical rationale founded upon proper legal standards. Id. at 277. A strong public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7118 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was a substantial factor in causing the expenses for which restitution is claimed. Id., ¶10; see also State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55511 - 2010-10-13
was a substantial factor in causing the expenses for which restitution is claimed. Id., ¶10; see also State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55511 - 2010-10-13
State v. Audell Hernandez
that this court reviews de novo. See id. ¶7 Hernandez contends that his right to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15395 - 2005-03-31
that this court reviews de novo. See id. ¶7 Hernandez contends that his right to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15395 - 2005-03-31
State v. Victory Fireworks, Inc.
. See id. We conclude that the language in § 167.10(4), Stats., regarding sales to “a person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15059 - 2005-03-31
. See id. We conclude that the language in § 167.10(4), Stats., regarding sales to “a person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15059 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the circuit court’s functioning, we will look for reasons to sustain its discretionary rulings. Id. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338907 - 2021-02-25
to the circuit court’s functioning, we will look for reasons to sustain its discretionary rulings. Id. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338907 - 2021-02-25
COURT OF APPEALS
enforcement officer to believe that criminal activity may be in the works and that action is appropriate. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28697 - 2007-04-11
enforcement officer to believe that criminal activity may be in the works and that action is appropriate. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28697 - 2007-04-11