Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42071 - 42080 of 75070 for judgment for us.

Terry L. Benn v. James H. Benn
to determine if the circuit court logically interpreted the facts, applied the proper legal standard, and used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14631 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Perry Margoles v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
judgments regarding the interpretation of the statute than a court.” Id. at 286, 548 N.W.2d at 62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12043 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
before us. In 1996, Reed and Maurice Johnson were each charged with one count of first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191075 - 2017-09-21

Donald Lee v. Gary R. McCaughtry
action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable, representing the agency’s will, not its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11458 - 2005-03-31

2007 WI APP 17
may therefore signify an obligation to pay at a future time, but, when used without qualification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27364 - 2007-01-30

[PDF] WI APP 17
informs us that it had been following the policy expressed in the rule since Coutts, and applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27364 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
facts, applied a proper standard of law, and, using a demonstrated rational process, reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193668 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Donald Lee v. Gary R. McCaughtry
, representing the agency’s will, not its judgment; and (4) the evidence supported the agency’s decision. Kolb
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11458 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and remanded for the trial court to correct the judgment and resentence Wallace on that conviction. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182809 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
judgment, based on the statute of limitations found at WIS. STAT. § 893.57. ¶5 The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105846 - 2017-09-21