Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42081 - 42090 of 50514 for our.
Search results 42081 - 42090 of 50514 for our.
Susan A. Riemer v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Company
was partially decided on a motion for summary judgment. Our review of the trial court’s denial of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4886 - 2005-03-31
was partially decided on a motion for summary judgment. Our review of the trial court’s denial of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4886 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). If no, our analysis ends. If yes, we next examine whether admitting the statements violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131995 - 2017-09-21
). If no, our analysis ends. If yes, we next examine whether admitting the statements violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131995 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to the warrant requirements of our federal and state constitutions is a question of law subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119189 - 2014-08-12
to the warrant requirements of our federal and state constitutions is a question of law subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119189 - 2014-08-12
State v. Gregory A. Miller
source omitted). Our supreme court recently held that a defendant is entitled to a theory of defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11991 - 2005-03-31
source omitted). Our supreme court recently held that a defendant is entitled to a theory of defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11991 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles R. Wincek
supported by the record, we would affirm. We have not, therefore, ordered on our own motion that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11804 - 2005-03-31
supported by the record, we would affirm. We have not, therefore, ordered on our own motion that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11804 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id. at 581. During our review, “[t]his court owes great deference to a court’s decision granting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780614 - 2024-03-26
.” Id. at 581. During our review, “[t]his court owes great deference to a court’s decision granting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780614 - 2024-03-26
COURT OF APPEALS
For both the stop and the search, our standard of review is mixed. Whether there was reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131635 - 2014-12-16
For both the stop and the search, our standard of review is mixed. Whether there was reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131635 - 2014-12-16
COURT OF APPEALS
not been provided with police reports and witness statements. Id. ¶8 In Footnote 2 to our opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39849 - 2009-08-24
not been provided with police reports and witness statements. Id. ¶8 In Footnote 2 to our opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39849 - 2009-08-24
[PDF]
Real Estate Enterprises, LLC v. June J. Marth
a claim for relief and a material issue of fact, our inquiry shifts to the moving party’s affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11521 - 2017-09-19
a claim for relief and a material issue of fact, our inquiry shifts to the moving party’s affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11521 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to this claim. Our independent review of the record reveals no arguable basis for reversing the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105735 - 2017-09-21
to this claim. Our independent review of the record reveals no arguable basis for reversing the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105735 - 2017-09-21