Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4211 - 4220 of 6318 for 128.
Search results 4211 - 4220 of 6318 for 128.
COURT OF APPEALS
member of the administrative agency recommending prosecution.” Sears v. State, 94 Wis. 2d 128, 135, 287
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36592 - 2009-05-26
member of the administrative agency recommending prosecution.” Sears v. State, 94 Wis. 2d 128, 135, 287
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36592 - 2009-05-26
[PDF]
State v. Shuron C. Davis
and prejudicial, are questions of law. Id., 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d at 848. We need not address both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4789 - 2017-09-20
and prejudicial, are questions of law. Id., 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d at 848. We need not address both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4789 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990). If the defendant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=458073 - 2021-11-30
review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990). If the defendant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=458073 - 2021-11-30
[PDF]
State v. Vincent C. Lewis
performance was deficient and prejudicial, present a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5598 - 2017-09-19
performance was deficient and prejudicial, present a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5598 - 2017-09-19
State v. Kenneth D. Paulson
to show prejudice.” State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990) (citing Strickland, 466
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15776 - 2005-03-31
to show prejudice.” State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990) (citing Strickland, 466
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15776 - 2005-03-31
Dwaine Halverson v. River Falls Youth Hockey Association
for different reasons. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis.2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679, 687 (Ct. App. 1985) (court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14419 - 2005-03-31
for different reasons. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis.2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679, 687 (Ct. App. 1985) (court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14419 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
generally allow a respondent to argue alternative grounds for affirmance. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670587 - 2023-06-21
generally allow a respondent to argue alternative grounds for affirmance. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670587 - 2023-06-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Hefty v. Hefty, 172 Wis. 2d 124, 128 n.1, 493 N.W.2d 33 (1992). 7 MidCountry’s failure to cite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172825 - 2017-09-21
Hefty v. Hefty, 172 Wis. 2d 124, 128 n.1, 493 N.W.2d 33 (1992). 7 MidCountry’s failure to cite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172825 - 2017-09-21
State v. John E. Olson
the wrong legal rationale for doing so, we must affirm the admission of evidence. State v. Holt, 128 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11160 - 2005-03-31
the wrong legal rationale for doing so, we must affirm the admission of evidence. State v. Holt, 128 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11160 - 2005-03-31
WI App 101 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP1399-CR Complete Ti...
Benson is a question of law we review de novo. Id. at 128. To prove prejudice, Benson must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85654 - 2015-03-04
Benson is a question of law we review de novo. Id. at 128. To prove prejudice, Benson must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85654 - 2015-03-04