Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4211 - 4220 of 17421 for Cost.
Search results 4211 - 4220 of 17421 for Cost.
[PDF]
NOTICE
a verdict in excess of $109,000, the only estimate of the cost of the pool replacement. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58003 - 2014-09-15
a verdict in excess of $109,000, the only estimate of the cost of the pool replacement. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58003 - 2014-09-15
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Marvin E. Marks
) recovered for the client by the Attorney." Paragraphs Two and Three described various costs and expenses
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16542 - 2005-03-31
) recovered for the client by the Attorney." Paragraphs Two and Three described various costs and expenses
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16542 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - February 2015
to initiate an arbitration regarding the costs and fees it claimed from the underlying confirmation
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134567 - 2017-09-21
to initiate an arbitration regarding the costs and fees it claimed from the underlying confirmation
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134567 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Marvin E. Marks
Two and Three described various costs and expenses for which the client would be responsible
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16542 - 2017-09-21
Two and Three described various costs and expenses for which the client would be responsible
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16542 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 42
it appropriate to assess the full costs of the proceeding, which are $2,567.80, against Attorney Napierala
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=885190 - 2025-04-11
it appropriate to assess the full costs of the proceeding, which are $2,567.80, against Attorney Napierala
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=885190 - 2025-04-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was barred from “recovering damages for lost profits, repair costs, and loss adjustment and professional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273093 - 2020-07-28
was barred from “recovering damages for lost profits, repair costs, and loss adjustment and professional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273093 - 2020-07-28
[PDF]
Frontsheet
Hicks to pay the full costs of this disciplinary proceeding, which were $2,717.14 as of October 14
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166334 - 2017-09-21
Hicks to pay the full costs of this disciplinary proceeding, which were $2,717.14 as of October 14
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166334 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the parties’ motions. Finally, Stewart argued that Power Sports was not entitled to statutory costs. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=766813 - 2024-02-21
on the parties’ motions. Finally, Stewart argued that Power Sports was not entitled to statutory costs. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=766813 - 2024-02-21
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. James H. Dumke
be required to pay the costs of this proceeding, as the referee recommended. ¶17 IT IS ORDERED
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17471 - 2005-03-31
be required to pay the costs of this proceeding, as the referee recommended. ¶17 IT IS ORDERED
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17471 - 2005-03-31
John M. Minor v. David M. Jacek
was a non-conforming use under the city zoning code, the cost of repair or alteration to the house could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7358 - 2005-03-31
was a non-conforming use under the city zoning code, the cost of repair or alteration to the house could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7358 - 2005-03-31