Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4211 - 4220 of 6659 for mix.
Search results 4211 - 4220 of 6659 for mix.
State v. Stacey R. Wilhelm
A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel presents mixed questions of law and fact. Strickland v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6542 - 2005-03-31
A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel presents mixed questions of law and fact. Strickland v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6542 - 2005-03-31
Lynda D. Dahlke v. James S. Dahlke
of whether there has been a substantial change of circumstances presents a mixed question of fact and law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4858 - 2005-03-31
of whether there has been a substantial change of circumstances presents a mixed question of fact and law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4858 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Shuron C. Davis
an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim involves a mixed question of law and fact. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4789 - 2017-09-20
an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim involves a mixed question of law and fact. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4789 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Foist Johnson
present mixed questions of fact and law. See Sanchez, 201 Wis.2d at 236, 548 N.W.2d at 76. Findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11313 - 2017-09-19
present mixed questions of fact and law. See Sanchez, 201 Wis.2d at 236, 548 N.W.2d at 76. Findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11313 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s recommitment order under § 51.20 presents a mixed question of fact and law. Waukesha Cnty. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484218 - 2022-02-15
court’s recommitment order under § 51.20 presents a mixed question of fact and law. Waukesha Cnty. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484218 - 2022-02-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional fact. Id., ¶8. We review questions of constitutional fact using a mixed standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195116 - 2017-09-21
of constitutional fact. Id., ¶8. We review questions of constitutional fact using a mixed standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195116 - 2017-09-21
Kim Williams v. Anthony Morgan
of whether a claim is frivolous presents a mixed question of fact and law. Stoll v. Adriansen, 122 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12823 - 2005-03-31
of whether a claim is frivolous presents a mixed question of fact and law. Stoll v. Adriansen, 122 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12823 - 2005-03-31
State v. Barry A. Vann
standard” juvenile record, but that his “track record on supervision … seems to be mixed.” It noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18739 - 2005-06-27
standard” juvenile record, but that his “track record on supervision … seems to be mixed.” It noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18739 - 2005-06-27
State v. Michael A. Martin
Our standard for reviewing this claim involves mixed questions of law and fact. State v. Johnson, 153
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7069 - 2005-03-31
Our standard for reviewing this claim involves mixed questions of law and fact. State v. Johnson, 153
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7069 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of review. Stowe argues that we should employ the mixed standard of review set forth in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701648 - 2023-09-12
of review. Stowe argues that we should employ the mixed standard of review set forth in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701648 - 2023-09-12