Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4211 - 4220 of 60151 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 4211 - 4220 of 60151 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
and claimed that she was ineffective for not raising the judicial recusal and expert testimony issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61922 - 2014-09-15
and claimed that she was ineffective for not raising the judicial recusal and expert testimony issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61922 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Thomas Deffke
to § 948.40(1), STATS. Deffke claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10255 - 2017-09-20
to § 948.40(1), STATS. Deffke claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10255 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
would be preserved for appellate review and claimed that she was ineffective for not raising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61922 - 2011-03-28
would be preserved for appellate review and claimed that she was ineffective for not raising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61922 - 2011-03-28
COURT OF APPEALS
. We reject Przytarski’s claim that the court’s explanations amounted to acting as Schwefel’s “advocate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99716 - 2013-07-23
. We reject Przytarski’s claim that the court’s explanations amounted to acting as Schwefel’s “advocate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99716 - 2013-07-23
[PDF]
John Doe v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee
their complaints against the Archdiocese of Milwaukee. They claim that the trial court erred when it concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26312 - 2017-09-21
their complaints against the Archdiocese of Milwaukee. They claim that the trial court erred when it concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26312 - 2017-09-21
State v. Scott Edward Ziegler
other things, one count of party to the crime of arson. The complaint states that the victim claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7417 - 2005-05-09
other things, one count of party to the crime of arson. The complaint states that the victim claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7417 - 2005-05-09
[PDF]
State v. Scott Edward Ziegler
. The complaint states that the victim claimed approximately $100,000 in damages to his uninsured property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7417 - 2017-09-20
. The complaint states that the victim claimed approximately $100,000 in damages to his uninsured property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7417 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Gary G. Baumann v. Brian Saari
. The Saaris assert the Baumanns failed to prove their claim. However, the Saaris raise only factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25774 - 2017-09-21
. The Saaris assert the Baumanns failed to prove their claim. However, the Saaris raise only factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25774 - 2017-09-21
Gary G. Baumann v. Brian Saari
to the strip through adverse possession. The Saaris assert the Baumanns failed to prove their claim. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25774 - 2006-07-04
to the strip through adverse possession. The Saaris assert the Baumanns failed to prove their claim. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25774 - 2006-07-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
(collectively, Wagner), on claim preclusion grounds. Omegbu contends that the trial court erred when it: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27042 - 2014-09-15
(collectively, Wagner), on claim preclusion grounds. Omegbu contends that the trial court erred when it: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27042 - 2014-09-15