Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4211 - 4220 of 63187 for records.

[PDF] State v. Matthew D.
that the other two offenders, who had prior records, were both being waived into adult court. Tracey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13399 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140852 - 2015-04-28

[PDF] WI APP 58
of record” and reasonable inferences from those facts. Peplinski v. Fobe’s Roofing, Inc., 193 Wis. 2d 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718520 - 2023-12-19

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert T. Malloy
and commingling his own funds with them, failure to keep required trust account records, failure to respond
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17112 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Richard W. Hendrickson
of innocence, the record contained strong evidence of guilt. The court also No. 00-2519-CR 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3036 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
conclusions and raising additional issues. Upon our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132741 - 2017-09-21

State v. Media DeLao
deliberations, return home for the evening and return the next day without going on the record. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2712 - 2005-03-31

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert T. Malloy
and commingling his own funds with them, failure to keep required trust account records, failure to respond
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17112 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey L. Mosley
or unjustifiable basis for the sentence imposed. Id. If the record shows a process of reasoning based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9058 - 2005-03-31

State v. Artist Turner
that is consistent with the facts of record acts within the ambit of its permissible discretion. See Lievrouw v. Roth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9035 - 2005-03-31