Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4211 - 4220 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 4211 - 4220 of 58285 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(“OWI”) and the denial of his pre-trial motions for a directed verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936463 - 2025-04-03
(“OWI”) and the denial of his pre-trial motions for a directed verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936463 - 2025-04-03
State v. Walter Smith
. Reversed and cause remanded for a new trial. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Sullivan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8406 - 2005-03-31
. Reversed and cause remanded for a new trial. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Sullivan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8406 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
to a new trial because: (1) of newly-discovered evidence; and (2) his attorneys, both trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28401 - 2007-03-12
to a new trial because: (1) of newly-discovered evidence; and (2) his attorneys, both trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28401 - 2007-03-12
[PDF]
State v. Randolph P. Haushalter
-CR 2 STATS. Haushalter argues that the trial court erred in interpreting the penalty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15125 - 2017-09-21
-CR 2 STATS. Haushalter argues that the trial court erred in interpreting the penalty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15125 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. § 948.22(2) is ambiguous, and that, as a result, the jury was improperly instructed at trial, entitling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40739 - 2014-09-15
. § 948.22(2) is ambiguous, and that, as a result, the jury was improperly instructed at trial, entitling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40739 - 2014-09-15
State v. Roger P. Barber
.[1] He also appeals from the trial court’s orders denying his motions for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13448 - 2005-03-31
.[1] He also appeals from the trial court’s orders denying his motions for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13448 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven Buckingham
, Stats.[1] Buckingham also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12409 - 2005-03-31
, Stats.[1] Buckingham also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12409 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dennis L. Steele
trial. He contends that 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13267 - 2017-09-21
trial. He contends that 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13267 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael R. Cooper
Cooper also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5586 - 2017-09-19
Cooper also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5586 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-12). 1 He contends that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150640 - 2017-09-21
-12). 1 He contends that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150640 - 2017-09-21