Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4211 - 4220 of 7582 for ye.
Search results 4211 - 4220 of 7582 for ye.
State v. Clemente Lamont Alexander
was also asked whether he discussed his trial strategy with Alexander. Trial counsel replied: Yes. I am
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17821 - 2005-04-18
was also asked whether he discussed his trial strategy with Alexander. Trial counsel replied: Yes. I am
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17821 - 2005-04-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
]; is that correct? [The prosecutor]: Yes. THE COURT: And in 3482, my file doesn’t indicate what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30728 - 2014-09-15
]; is that correct? [The prosecutor]: Yes. THE COURT: And in 3482, my file doesn’t indicate what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30728 - 2014-09-15
State v. Charles A. Eggenberger
of May, did you have some contact with the defendant? A Yes, I did. Q Did he make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2587 - 2005-03-31
of May, did you have some contact with the defendant? A Yes, I did. Q Did he make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2587 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Corey D. Williams
was prepared to proceed; Williams answered “Yes.” A lengthy plea colloquy followed. 2 ¶4 During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5382 - 2017-09-19
was prepared to proceed; Williams answered “Yes.” A lengthy plea colloquy followed. 2 ¶4 During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5382 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
continued, and Love answered, “Yes, Your Honor.” The trial court next asked if Love had “talk[ed] to [his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=525663 - 2022-06-01
continued, and Love answered, “Yes, Your Honor.” The trial court next asked if Love had “talk[ed] to [his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=525663 - 2022-06-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. [B.], you are the foreperson, right? THE JUROR: Yes, sir. THE COURT: We are looking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210691 - 2018-04-10
. [B.], you are the foreperson, right? THE JUROR: Yes, sir. THE COURT: We are looking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210691 - 2018-04-10
[PDF]
State v. Rhonda Spaulding
have my watch? A. (Nods head affirmatively) Q. What did you just tell me? A. Yes. Q. Yes. Okay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3260 - 2017-09-19
have my watch? A. (Nods head affirmatively) Q. What did you just tell me? A. Yes. Q. Yes. Okay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3260 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
not object: Q You have got Christopher, correct? A Yes, ma’am. Q And are you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44568 - 2009-12-14
not object: Q You have got Christopher, correct? A Yes, ma’am. Q And are you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44568 - 2009-12-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
] Yes, ma’am. [Attorney] And, if you would have been able to assume the loan, the Coles would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202437 - 2017-11-14
] Yes, ma’am. [Attorney] And, if you would have been able to assume the loan, the Coles would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202437 - 2017-11-14
[PDF]
State v. Timothy M. Secrist
down when you were speaking to the subject? A Yes, it was. Q And as you were speaking
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17299 - 2017-09-21
down when you were speaking to the subject? A Yes, it was. Q And as you were speaking
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17299 - 2017-09-21