Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42101 - 42110 of 83992 for case number.
Search results 42101 - 42110 of 83992 for case number.
State v. Carlton Maruki Jones
” sentences. Based on our review of this case, we cannot conclude that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17664 - 2005-04-11
” sentences. Based on our review of this case, we cannot conclude that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17664 - 2005-04-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Helen are not victims in the case currently before us, they are the victims in a criminal proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448248 - 2021-11-02
and Helen are not victims in the case currently before us, they are the victims in a criminal proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448248 - 2021-11-02
Steven E. Mariades v. Marquette County
, and we held our decision in abeyance pending issuance of the supreme court’s opinion in a case raising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13354 - 2005-03-31
, and we held our decision in abeyance pending issuance of the supreme court’s opinion in a case raising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13354 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
-defense. Because in self-defense cases, evidence of prior specific acts of violence by the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28299 - 2014-09-15
-defense. Because in self-defense cases, evidence of prior specific acts of violence by the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28299 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to Intrastate Detainer cases; and (3) vacation of the DNA surcharge, fees and costs and restitution imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192635 - 2017-09-21
to Intrastate Detainer cases; and (3) vacation of the DNA surcharge, fees and costs and restitution imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192635 - 2017-09-21
State v. Belinda C. Wolf
that the State’s case was largely circumstantial. ¶6 This court will uphold a conviction unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16197 - 2005-03-31
that the State’s case was largely circumstantial. ¶6 This court will uphold a conviction unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16197 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Murray
under the circumstances presented by this case to set a parole eligibility date if I sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9682 - 2017-09-19
under the circumstances presented by this case to set a parole eligibility date if I sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9682 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the dispositional order, remands this case for a new trial before a different circuit court judge, and declines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=902659 - 2025-01-22
the dispositional order, remands this case for a new trial before a different circuit court judge, and declines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=902659 - 2025-01-22
State v. Brook Grzelak
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1454-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12501 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1454-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12501 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tomas R. Payano-Roman
2005 WI App 118 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2004AP1029-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18072 - 2005-07-06
2005 WI App 118 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2004AP1029-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18072 - 2005-07-06