Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42101 - 42110 of 75318 for judgment for us.
Search results 42101 - 42110 of 75318 for judgment for us.
2007 WI APP 50
by reference into the judgment of divorce, recited that both parents were fit and proper persons to have legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28184 - 2007-03-27
by reference into the judgment of divorce, recited that both parents were fit and proper persons to have legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28184 - 2007-03-27
State v. Ary L. Jones, Sr.
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: Patrick C. Haughney, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4558 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: Patrick C. Haughney, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4558 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Therefore, we summarily affirm the judgment of conviction and the order denying Sutrick’s postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11
. Therefore, we summarily affirm the judgment of conviction and the order denying Sutrick’s postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(“Section 227.57(8) states that ‘the court shall not substitute its judgment for that of the agency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88117 - 2014-09-15
(“Section 227.57(8) states that ‘the court shall not substitute its judgment for that of the agency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88117 - 2014-09-15
Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
This case was presented to the trial court on cross-motions for summary judgment, and there is no dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15541 - 2005-03-31
This case was presented to the trial court on cross-motions for summary judgment, and there is no dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15541 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
relief from judgment pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 806.07(1), in which he requested a hearing to address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142942 - 2015-06-10
relief from judgment pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 806.07(1), in which he requested a hearing to address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142942 - 2015-06-10
State v. Ronald V. Kurszewski
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Portage County: John v. Finn, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9198 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Portage County: John v. Finn, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9198 - 2005-03-31
Eugene Parks v. City of Madison
(2), MGO, would require us to conclude that the common council, by its amendment to § 3.58(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7723 - 2005-03-31
(2), MGO, would require us to conclude that the common council, by its amendment to § 3.58(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7723 - 2005-03-31
Richard Winters v. Gary R. McCaughtry
; but the court shall not substitute its judgment for that of the agency on an issue of discretion. Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7471 - 2005-03-31
; but the court shall not substitute its judgment for that of the agency on an issue of discretion. Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7471 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 74
a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: WILLIAM S. POCAN, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197642 - 2017-12-12
a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: WILLIAM S. POCAN, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197642 - 2017-12-12