Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42111 - 42120 of 50514 for our.
Search results 42111 - 42120 of 50514 for our.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
confession by a defendant, on the other.” Id. at 165. Our supreme court has held that a defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938405 - 2025-04-08
confession by a defendant, on the other.” Id. at 165. Our supreme court has held that a defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938405 - 2025-04-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078680 - 2026-02-17
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078680 - 2026-02-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
preclusion. Based upon our review of the briefs No. 2020AP1870 2 and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=533274 - 2022-06-16
preclusion. Based upon our review of the briefs No. 2020AP1870 2 and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=533274 - 2022-06-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
of our October 13, 2009 order and instead argues that Baird conceded the merits of Kingstad’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49635 - 2014-09-15
of our October 13, 2009 order and instead argues that Baird conceded the merits of Kingstad’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49635 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
deficiently, Tallie has not shown that he was prejudiced. In resolving this appeal, we adopt as our own
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88163 - 2014-09-15
deficiently, Tallie has not shown that he was prejudiced. In resolving this appeal, we adopt as our own
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88163 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
was not “help,” but some other word the officer couldn’t understand, our conclusion would be the same: Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59077 - 2014-09-15
was not “help,” but some other word the officer couldn’t understand, our conclusion would be the same: Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59077 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
the testimony of the witnesses as to the charge in this appeal. Our independent review of the record reveals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133189 - 2015-01-15
the testimony of the witnesses as to the charge in this appeal. Our independent review of the record reveals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133189 - 2015-01-15
CA Blank Order
be no arguable merit to a challenge to the sentencing court’s discretion. Our independent review of the Record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121175 - 2014-09-03
be no arguable merit to a challenge to the sentencing court’s discretion. Our independent review of the Record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121175 - 2014-09-03
State v. Donald J. Myers
it was a benign action.” ¶11 Under the deferential rules applicable to our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15647 - 2005-03-31
it was a benign action.” ¶11 Under the deferential rules applicable to our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15647 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ramiro Villareal
). Our review of this issue is governed by the erroneous exercise of discretion standard. State v. Jones
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8849 - 2005-03-31
). Our review of this issue is governed by the erroneous exercise of discretion standard. State v. Jones
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8849 - 2005-03-31