Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42121 - 42130 of 55208 for n c.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
supports the trial court’s ruling.’” See State v. McAttee, 2001 WI App 262, ¶5 n.1, 248 Wis. 2d 865
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737200 - 2023-12-06

COURT OF APPEALS
. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 59, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996). It is well established, however, that [i]n dealing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28602 - 2007-03-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, ¶35 n.8 (“[A] circuit court has authority to modify a sentence even though no new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267924 - 2020-07-09

COURT OF APPEALS
. Hoffman, 318 U.S. 109, 112 n.2 (1943) (citation omitted)). By the Court.—Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110385 - 2014-04-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
on different grounds than relied on by the circuit court. See State v. Earl, 2009 WI App 99, ¶18 n.8, 320
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192379 - 2017-09-21

State v. Shirlene Davis
United States v. Ramirez, 523 U.S. 65, 72 n.3 (1998) (recognizing that there must be a “causal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16037 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to the finding of probable cause); State v. Mann, 123 Wis. 2d 375, 385-89, 367 N.W.2d 209 (1985) (“[A]n omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238716 - 2019-04-09

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Lickes, 2021 WI 60, ¶33 n.10, 397 Wis. 2d 586, 960 N.W.2d 855 (“Issues that are not dispositive need
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470200 - 2022-01-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 2002 WI App 192, ¶1 n.1, 256 Wis. 2d 848, 650 N.W.2d 75 (“An argument asserted by a respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232931 - 2019-01-17

COURT OF APPEALS
Citing State v. Basley, 2006 WI App 253, ¶9 & n.4, 298 Wis. 2d 232, 726 N.W.2d 671, Rhodes contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31233 - 2008-02-19