Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42151 - 42160 of 57315 for id.

State v. David William Newbury
not receive a fair trial. See id. at 545, 182 N.W.2d at 286. Factors to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8719 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
” claims that the pleas were unknowingly and involuntarily entered. See id. at 992. ¶11 Anderson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91964 - 2013-01-23

COURT OF APPEALS
to be taken into consideration by the [trial] court.” Id., 2004 WI App 181, ¶20, 276 Wis. 2d at 240, 688 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112199 - 2014-05-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a reasoned explanation for its decision. Id. ¶12 A trial court has “considerable leeway in deciding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985938 - 2025-07-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with family members,” see id., 234 Wis. 2d 606, ¶29. Upon remanding a termination matter back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213514 - 2018-05-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to warrant a new trial.” Id. ¶8 Not all trial errors warrant granting a mistrial as “the law prefers less
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180812 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
of Wallace as the perpetrator was the crux of the State’s case. Id. No. 2006AP2888 3 ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32889 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on No. 2012AP2489 5 either ground. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104150 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 23
the words chosen by the legislature. Id. “Statutory language is given its common, ordinary, and accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348435 - 2021-05-10

[PDF] CA Blank Order
in Hampton. See id., ¶¶8, 14. Because the court ultimately departed from the sentencing recommendation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=548476 - 2022-07-26