Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42161 - 42170 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 42161 - 42170 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. James I. Montroy
convictions. ¶5 At a May 17, 2004, motion hearing, Montroy’s counsel[1] claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19432 - 2005-10-27
convictions. ¶5 At a May 17, 2004, motion hearing, Montroy’s counsel[1] claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19432 - 2005-10-27
COURT OF APPEALS
the Paulsens may yet claim their rights under the easement agreement by “construct[ing] and maintain[ing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43131 - 2009-11-04
the Paulsens may yet claim their rights under the easement agreement by “construct[ing] and maintain[ing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43131 - 2009-11-04
State v. Winnebago County
the landowners from securing the highest and best use of the parcel. The State alternatively claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8338 - 2005-03-31
the landowners from securing the highest and best use of the parcel. The State alternatively claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8338 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Nathaniel Whaley
to this court, claiming the evidence should not have been excluded. We concluded that the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10113 - 2017-09-19
to this court, claiming the evidence should not have been excluded. We concluded that the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10113 - 2017-09-19
State v. Anthony J. Randle
the judgment and withdraw his plea. Randle claims: (1) the trial court erred in ruling that he waived his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4020 - 2005-03-31
the judgment and withdraw his plea. Randle claims: (1) the trial court erred in ruling that he waived his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4020 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
after the accident, raising a number of negligence claims. Menard responded by asserting it was immune
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83349 - 2012-06-04
after the accident, raising a number of negligence claims. Menard responded by asserting it was immune
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83349 - 2012-06-04
[PDF]
State v. Winnebago County
of the parcel. The State alternatively claims that the Board's decision should be overturned No. 94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8338 - 2017-09-19
of the parcel. The State alternatively claims that the Board's decision should be overturned No. 94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8338 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
there is any arguable merit to a claim the court failed to comply with mandatory time limits, thereby losing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120984 - 2014-09-01
there is any arguable merit to a claim the court failed to comply with mandatory time limits, thereby losing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120984 - 2014-09-01
State v. Donald Miller
, Stats. Here, the record fails to support Miller's claim that he was denied his right of cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14993 - 2005-03-31
, Stats. Here, the record fails to support Miller's claim that he was denied his right of cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14993 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2006, a news organization received an e-mail from a person claiming knowledge of the victim’s death
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98299 - 2014-09-15
, 2006, a news organization received an e-mail from a person claiming knowledge of the victim’s death
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98299 - 2014-09-15