Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42161 - 42170 of 58791 for do.
Search results 42161 - 42170 of 58791 for do.
COURT OF APPEALS
of certiorari. However, even if we were to do so, we would nevertheless affirm the circuit court. As the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94895 - 2013-04-01
of certiorari. However, even if we were to do so, we would nevertheless affirm the circuit court. As the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94895 - 2013-04-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
“[o]ur conclusions do not render a parent’s incarceration irrelevant .… a parent’s incarceration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28141 - 2014-09-15
“[o]ur conclusions do not render a parent’s incarceration irrelevant .… a parent’s incarceration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28141 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
transfer. We do not agree with that underlying proposition. Azarian’s argument requires interpretation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123596 - 2014-10-07
transfer. We do not agree with that underlying proposition. Azarian’s argument requires interpretation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123596 - 2014-10-07
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
not discourage the court from making such findings on the record, we recognize that doing so is not always
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28422 - 2007-03-12
not discourage the court from making such findings on the record, we recognize that doing so is not always
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28422 - 2007-03-12
[PDF]
State v. San Juanita Lopez Canida
this argument, and therefore we do not consider Canida’s testimony in this opinion. ¶8 We first address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14744 - 2017-09-21
this argument, and therefore we do not consider Canida’s testimony in this opinion. ¶8 We first address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14744 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 1989) (a defendant may not challenge on appeal a sentence that he affirmatively approved). We do
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207236 - 2018-01-17
. 1989) (a defendant may not challenge on appeal a sentence that he affirmatively approved). We do
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207236 - 2018-01-17
State v. Charles W. Johnson
you’re incarcerated whenever you do return to the community it is feared you will return back to a life
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14687 - 2005-03-31
you’re incarcerated whenever you do return to the community it is feared you will return back to a life
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14687 - 2005-03-31
Julia K. Wleklinski v. Trostel
because of the holdings of Miller and Holley. The circuit court was correct in doing so. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2613 - 2005-03-31
because of the holdings of Miller and Holley. The circuit court was correct in doing so. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2613 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel J. Voigt
. We do not read the plea agreement that way. The transcript of the plea hearing shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14761 - 2017-09-21
. We do not read the plea agreement that way. The transcript of the plea hearing shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14761 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard R. Burch
. App. 1989). We do not reverse a discretionary determination if the court has considered the relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9952 - 2005-03-31
. App. 1989). We do not reverse a discretionary determination if the court has considered the relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9952 - 2005-03-31