Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42171 - 42180 of 68259 for law.
Search results 42171 - 42180 of 68259 for law.
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶4 Earl was represented at trial by Attorney Jeffrey Jensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53150 - 2010-08-10
of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶4 Earl was represented at trial by Attorney Jeffrey Jensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53150 - 2010-08-10
State v. Joseph L. Van Patten
of the performance and prejudice prongs of Strickland is a mixed question of law and fact, and the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11600 - 2005-03-31
of the performance and prejudice prongs of Strickland is a mixed question of law and fact, and the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11600 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert K.
no “wishes” beyond what the law determines is in their best interests. When that is true, “[t]he guardian ad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7641 - 2005-03-31
no “wishes” beyond what the law determines is in their best interests. When that is true, “[t]he guardian ad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7641 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gary D. Kluczynski
the jury instructions and follow the law, I’m not grateful to you. In any event, thank you very much
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26066 - 2006-08-01
the jury instructions and follow the law, I’m not grateful to you. In any event, thank you very much
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26066 - 2006-08-01
COURT OF APPEALS
legally relevant factors, or has acted based upon mistaken facts or an erroneous view of law. Id.; Duffy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94977 - 2013-04-03
legally relevant factors, or has acted based upon mistaken facts or an erroneous view of law. Id.; Duffy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94977 - 2013-04-03
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Id.; Wis. Stat. § 802.08(2) (2013-14).[2] ¶9 In order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135469 - 2015-02-23
is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Id.; Wis. Stat. § 802.08(2) (2013-14).[2] ¶9 In order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135469 - 2015-02-23
County of Burnett v. Daniel F. Kaye
interpretation, the application of undisputed facts to the law, and the constitutionality of the sanitary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16098 - 2005-03-31
interpretation, the application of undisputed facts to the law, and the constitutionality of the sanitary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16098 - 2005-03-31
Jennifer Redding v. Mark Ralfs
N.W.2d at 102, the question of whether those facts fulfill a legal standard is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11426 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d at 102, the question of whether those facts fulfill a legal standard is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11426 - 2005-03-31
John Bettendorf v. St. Croix County Board of Adjustment
other things, whether the board proceeded under a correct theory of law. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14376 - 2005-03-31
other things, whether the board proceeded under a correct theory of law. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14376 - 2005-03-31
David Burch v. Village of Hammond
) the board acted according to the law; (3) the action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5947 - 2005-03-31
) the board acted according to the law; (3) the action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5947 - 2005-03-31