Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42171 - 42180 of 74828 for public records.
Search results 42171 - 42180 of 74828 for public records.
[PDF]
State v. Steven T. Miller
. On our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9136 - 2017-09-19
. On our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9136 - 2017-09-19
State v. Steven T. Miller
. Miller has responded to the report. On our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9136 - 2005-03-31
. Miller has responded to the report. On our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9136 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert L. Von Haden, Jr.
of the State’s expert witness’s records was improper; (7) the court erred by overruling his objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7060 - 2005-03-31
of the State’s expert witness’s records was improper; (7) the court erred by overruling his objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7060 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. Von Haden, Jr.
in camera review of the State’s expert witness’s records was improper; (7) the court erred by overruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7060 - 2017-09-20
in camera review of the State’s expert witness’s records was improper; (7) the court erred by overruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7060 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for dismissal. Based upon our review of the brief and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632888 - 2023-03-14
for dismissal. Based upon our review of the brief and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632888 - 2023-03-14
[PDF]
Robert Anthony Lee v. C.O. Lutzow
is whether the committee provided Lee with due process. We conclude that the record is insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7952 - 2017-09-19
is whether the committee provided Lee with due process. We conclude that the record is insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7952 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
process rights were violated because the No. 2007AP192 2 record did not contain the official
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34248 - 2014-09-15
process rights were violated because the No. 2007AP192 2 record did not contain the official
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34248 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Randy J. Krueger
offense by introducing a certified copy of his driving record and that the court erroneously submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11489 - 2017-09-19
offense by introducing a certified copy of his driving record and that the court erroneously submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11489 - 2017-09-19
State v. Timothy D. Lewis
postconviction order seeking discovery of the victim’s medical records. Lewis claims the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4118 - 2005-03-31
postconviction order seeking discovery of the victim’s medical records. Lewis claims the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4118 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Timothy D. Lewis
seeking discovery of the victim’s medical records. Lewis claims the trial court erred when it denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4118 - 2017-09-20
seeking discovery of the victim’s medical records. Lewis claims the trial court erred when it denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4118 - 2017-09-20