Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4221 - 4230 of 40298 for Antique 💥🏹 antiquewolrd.com 💥🏹 antique news 💥🏹 clean antique 💥🏹 antique brass 💥🏹 antiqueworld.
Search results 4221 - 4230 of 40298 for Antique 💥🏹 antiquewolrd.com 💥🏹 antique news 💥🏹 clean antique 💥🏹 antique brass 💥🏹 antiqueworld.
COURT OF APPEALS
that his ineligibility for the ERP constituted a new factor. Specifically, Grubor asked that one of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103595 - 2013-10-29
that his ineligibility for the ERP constituted a new factor. Specifically, Grubor asked that one of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103595 - 2013-10-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. In the other motion, Bullock sought a new trial based upon two new allegations of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235352 - 2019-02-20
. In the other motion, Bullock sought a new trial based upon two new allegations of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235352 - 2019-02-20
[PDF]
State v. Christopher M. Clutter
to exercise its discretionary power to order a new trial in the interests of justice because Clutter, who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15261 - 2017-09-21
to exercise its discretionary power to order a new trial in the interests of justice because Clutter, who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15261 - 2017-09-21
State v. Christopher M. Clutter
discretionary power to order a new trial in the interests of justice because Clutter, who appeared pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15261 - 2005-03-31
discretionary power to order a new trial in the interests of justice because Clutter, who appeared pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15261 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel Marcellus Johnson
to court for sentencing. According to his new defense counsel’s testimony at the Machner[2] hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11940 - 2005-03-31
to court for sentencing. According to his new defense counsel’s testimony at the Machner[2] hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11940 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gary L. Everts
was not a new factor warranting sentence modification in this case. The trial court further rejected Everts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18233 - 2005-05-24
was not a new factor warranting sentence modification in this case. The trial court further rejected Everts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18233 - 2005-05-24
State v. Mareese Anderson
., commitment as a “new factor”; (2) the court failed to consider his postconviction schizophrenia diagnosis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11809 - 2005-03-31
., commitment as a “new factor”; (2) the court failed to consider his postconviction schizophrenia diagnosis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11809 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel Marcellus Johnson
to court for sentencing. According to his new defense counsel’s testimony at the Machner[2] hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11939 - 2005-03-31
to court for sentencing. According to his new defense counsel’s testimony at the Machner[2] hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11939 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gary L. Everts
from three years to one year was not a new factor warranting sentence modification in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18233 - 2017-09-21
from three years to one year was not a new factor warranting sentence modification in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18233 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for new counsel and his presentencing motion to withdraw No. 2016AP1018-CR 2 his plea. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190549 - 2017-09-21
for new counsel and his presentencing motion to withdraw No. 2016AP1018-CR 2 his plea. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190549 - 2017-09-21