Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4221 - 4230 of 11706 for WA 0821 1305 0400 [[Adefa]] Pusat Penjualan Geomat 3D di Denpasar Bali.

State v. Brian D. Robins
come to a similar conclusion, see United States v. Bailey, 228 F.3d 637, 639 (6th Cir. 2000)("Defendant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16431 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Leamon Hoover
, 99 F.3d 499 (2d Cir. 1996), upon which Hoover relies, where the alleged look-alike was at the scene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14784 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 24, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
, 25 P.3d 1081, 1087-88 (Cal. 2001) (holding physical control of contraband during the “brief moment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26867 - 2006-10-23

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of Marinette, 2025 WI App 19, ¶76, 415 Wis. 2d 635, 19 N.W.3d 663 (stating that we “decide cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032693 - 2025-11-04

COURT OF APPEALS
reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. In support, Nelson relies on United States v. Cohen, 481 F.3d 896
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88591 - 2012-10-22

Connie Anne Shaw v. Greg Leatherberry
that prison officials retaliated for exercise of First Amendment rights); McNair v. Coffey, 234 F.3d 352, 355
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1230 - 2005-02-09

[PDF] NOTICE
the merits of the federal issue here, but it is discussed in United States v. Chambers, 473 F.3d 724 (7th
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42750 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
household items remained throughout the home. As noted in United States v. Wright, 838 F.3d 880, 886 (7th
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050789 - 2025-12-17

[PDF] Connie Anne Shaw v. Greg Leatherberry
for exercise of First Amendment rights); McNair v. Coffey, 234 F.3d 352, 355 (7th Cir. 2000) (applying
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1230 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
issue here, but it is discussed in United States v. Chambers, 473 F.3d 724 (7th Cir. 2007), rev’d, 129 S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42750 - 2009-10-28