Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4221 - 4230 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
Search results 4221 - 4230 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
County of Dane v. Gary M. Sam
of constitutional principles to undisputed facts, we will review the trial court's decision de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11255 - 2017-09-19
of constitutional principles to undisputed facts, we will review the trial court's decision de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11255 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. We then review de novo the circuit court’s conclusion, drawn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195671 - 2017-09-21
unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. We then review de novo the circuit court’s conclusion, drawn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195671 - 2017-09-21
Daniel V. v. Debie M.
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9150 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9150 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) (the application of the facts to statutory recommitment requirements presents a question of law we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239082 - 2019-04-17
) (the application of the facts to statutory recommitment requirements presents a question of law we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239082 - 2019-04-17
CA Blank Order
not matter for purposes of our review, since this court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146987 - 2015-08-19
not matter for purposes of our review, since this court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146987 - 2015-08-19
State v. Ryan D. Thompson
reviews de novo. Id. ¶5 We conclude that no evidence exists to allow a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5686 - 2005-03-31
reviews de novo. Id. ¶5 We conclude that no evidence exists to allow a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5686 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
review of the circuit court’s order “affirming the decision” of the Municipal Court, but in a de minimis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26670 - 2006-10-09
review of the circuit court’s order “affirming the decision” of the Municipal Court, but in a de minimis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26670 - 2006-10-09
State v. Mark E. Hanson
. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 60, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996). This court reviews de novo whether the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25726 - 2006-07-04
. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 60, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996). This court reviews de novo whether the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25726 - 2006-07-04
State v. Gerald Heckathorn
of his suppression issue de novo, as a matter of law. See State v. Benton, 2001 WI App 81, 195, 243 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17824 - 2005-05-02
of his suppression issue de novo, as a matter of law. See State v. Benton, 2001 WI App 81, 195, 243 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17824 - 2005-05-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App. 1979). No. 2022AP2143 3 review de novo. State v. Romero
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795008 - 2024-05-01
N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App. 1979). No. 2022AP2143 3 review de novo. State v. Romero
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795008 - 2024-05-01