Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4221 - 4230 of 68534 for law.
Search results 4221 - 4230 of 68534 for law.
State v. James G. Halverson
that Halverson had violated the law and that the scope of the seizure was reasonable. Accordingly, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5070 - 2005-03-31
that Halverson had violated the law and that the scope of the seizure was reasonable. Accordingly, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5070 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James G. Halverson
conclude that the traffic stop was supported by reasonable suspicion that Halverson had violated the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5070 - 2017-09-19
conclude that the traffic stop was supported by reasonable suspicion that Halverson had violated the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5070 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mason S.
, Judge. Reversed. NETTESHEIM, J. The law holds that when a defendant harbors an honest belief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15236 - 2017-09-21
, Judge. Reversed. NETTESHEIM, J. The law holds that when a defendant harbors an honest belief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15236 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
This case requires us to decide whether the City of Waukesha acted within the bounds of the law when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140335 - 2017-09-21
This case requires us to decide whether the City of Waukesha acted within the bounds of the law when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140335 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeffrey G. Henschel
on the grounds that his double jeopardy rights had been violated. He alleged that law enforcement officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12424 - 2005-03-31
on the grounds that his double jeopardy rights had been violated. He alleged that law enforcement officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12424 - 2005-03-31
County of Winnebago v. Larry A. Schmitz
test into evidence under the statutory presumption of admissibility provided in the implied consent law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3227 - 2005-03-31
test into evidence under the statutory presumption of admissibility provided in the implied consent law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3227 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Luster Goodman, Jr.
the cocaine from Wesley in order to protect Wesley's baby. II. A. Necessity. Under Wisconsin law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10553 - 2017-09-20
the cocaine from Wesley in order to protect Wesley's baby. II. A. Necessity. Under Wisconsin law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10553 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
truck. The caller was Cleary’s wife. The deputy was familiar with the Cleary family because law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142368 - 2017-09-21
truck. The caller was Cleary’s wife. The deputy was familiar with the Cleary family because law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142368 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Elizabeth H. Taylor v. James A. Taylor
as determined fulfill a legal conclusion presents a question of law which we review de novo. See Popp v. Popp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9911 - 2017-09-19
as determined fulfill a legal conclusion presents a question of law which we review de novo. See Popp v. Popp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9911 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to do so was “unreasonable” and amounted to “shirking.” But Gibbons is wrong on the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34980 - 2008-12-22
to do so was “unreasonable” and amounted to “shirking.” But Gibbons is wrong on the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34980 - 2008-12-22