Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4221 - 4230 of 17268 for probate/1000.
Search results 4221 - 4230 of 17268 for probate/1000.
State v. Brian M.
court extended Davis’s probation for the collection of outstanding restitution despite the fact that all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6457 - 2005-03-31
court extended Davis’s probation for the collection of outstanding restitution despite the fact that all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6457 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brian M.
court extended Davis’s probation for the collection of outstanding restitution despite the fact that all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6459 - 2005-03-31
court extended Davis’s probation for the collection of outstanding restitution despite the fact that all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6459 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brian M.
court extended Davis’s probation for the collection of outstanding restitution despite the fact that all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6458 - 2005-03-31
court extended Davis’s probation for the collection of outstanding restitution despite the fact that all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6458 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
and sentenced Attorney Rudolph to ten days of unsupervised probation. The probationary period was subsequently
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40890 - 2009-09-14
and sentenced Attorney Rudolph to ten days of unsupervised probation. The probationary period was subsequently
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40890 - 2009-09-14
State v. Jerod J. Bins
his plea, found him guilty, withheld sentence and placed him on probation for one year. The entire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4050 - 2005-03-31
his plea, found him guilty, withheld sentence and placed him on probation for one year. The entire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4050 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
before he entered his plea that the court would impose probation. At the postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56489 - 2014-09-15
before he entered his plea that the court would impose probation. At the postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56489 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
impose probation. At the postconviction motion hearing, Galvin testified that he discussed his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56489 - 2010-11-09
impose probation. At the postconviction motion hearing, Galvin testified that he discussed his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56489 - 2010-11-09
[PDF]
State v. John Robert John
to be No. 00-3202-CR 2 imposed as a condition of probation because of its failure to comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3315 - 2017-09-19
to be No. 00-3202-CR 2 imposed as a condition of probation because of its failure to comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3315 - 2017-09-19
State v. John Robert John
court lost jurisdiction to determine the amount of restitution to be imposed as a condition of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3315 - 2005-03-31
court lost jurisdiction to determine the amount of restitution to be imposed as a condition of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3315 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lorne Demars
’ imprisonment and ten years’ probation on the two counts of burglary, party to a crime as a repeater
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4011 - 2005-03-31
’ imprisonment and ten years’ probation on the two counts of burglary, party to a crime as a repeater
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4011 - 2005-03-31