Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4221 - 4230 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 4221 - 4230 of 58506 for speedy trial.
State v. Roger P. Barber
.[1] He also appeals from the trial court’s orders denying his motions for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13448 - 2005-03-31
.[1] He also appeals from the trial court’s orders denying his motions for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13448 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. Morgan argues that the trial court erred when it: (1) denied his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34977 - 2008-12-22
for postconviction relief. Morgan argues that the trial court erred when it: (1) denied his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34977 - 2008-12-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
Crawford presided over the jury trial and sentencing hearing. The Honorable David A. Hansher heard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28401 - 2014-09-15
Crawford presided over the jury trial and sentencing hearing. The Honorable David A. Hansher heard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28401 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Duran Thomas
is unconstitutional. Further, he submits that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2460 - 2017-09-19
is unconstitutional. Further, he submits that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2460 - 2017-09-19
State v. Walter Smith
. Reversed and cause remanded for a new trial. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Sullivan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8406 - 2005-03-31
. Reversed and cause remanded for a new trial. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Sullivan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8406 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. § 948.22(2) is ambiguous, and that, as a result, the jury was improperly instructed at trial, entitling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40739 - 2014-09-15
. § 948.22(2) is ambiguous, and that, as a result, the jury was improperly instructed at trial, entitling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40739 - 2014-09-15
State v. Duran Thomas
ambiguity, the statute is unconstitutional. Further, he submits that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2460 - 2005-03-31
ambiguity, the statute is unconstitutional. Further, he submits that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2460 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(“OWI”) and the denial of his pre-trial motions for a directed verdict
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936463 - 2025-04-03
(“OWI”) and the denial of his pre-trial motions for a directed verdict
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936463 - 2025-04-03
[PDF]
Steven C. Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.
, 677 N.W.2d 233. Tietsworth contends first, that the trial court erred in concluding that under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20569 - 2017-09-21
, 677 N.W.2d 233. Tietsworth contends first, that the trial court erred in concluding that under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20569 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Steven Buckingham
Buckingham also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motions for plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12409 - 2014-09-15
Buckingham also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motions for plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12409 - 2014-09-15