Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42211 - 42220 of 57351 for id.
Search results 42211 - 42220 of 57351 for id.
[PDF]
State v. Audell Hernandez
reviews de novo. See id. ¶7 Hernandez contends that his right to testify in defense of the homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15395 - 2017-09-21
reviews de novo. See id. ¶7 Hernandez contends that his right to testify in defense of the homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15395 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that was not preserved with a postconviction motion—in the trial court. See id. at 1-2 (citing State ex rel. Rothering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125288 - 2017-09-21
that was not preserved with a postconviction motion—in the trial court. See id. at 1-2 (citing State ex rel. Rothering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125288 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47195 - 2014-09-15
there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47195 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
factors concerning the defendant, the offense, and the community. See id. The trial court has discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128829 - 2014-11-12
factors concerning the defendant, the offense, and the community. See id. The trial court has discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128829 - 2014-11-12
COURT OF APPEALS
was exercising ordinary care in driving at the time of the accident, and thus was not negligent. See id., ¶22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95625 - 2013-04-17
was exercising ordinary care in driving at the time of the accident, and thus was not negligent. See id., ¶22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95625 - 2013-04-17
[PDF]
State v. Andrew S. Miller
that is lawful under the Speedy Trial Act generally will comply with the mandate of the Detainer Act.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5097 - 2017-09-19
that is lawful under the Speedy Trial Act generally will comply with the mandate of the Detainer Act.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5097 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Michael J. McCullough v. Leonard J. Lewensohn
economic damages.” Id., 173 Wis.2d at 60, 496 N.W.2d at 117. McCullough asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12200 - 2017-09-21
economic damages.” Id., 173 Wis.2d at 60, 496 N.W.2d at 117. McCullough asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12200 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
applied the correct standard of law to the facts of the case. See id., ¶32. ¶15 In making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592618 - 2022-11-22
applied the correct standard of law to the facts of the case. See id., ¶32. ¶15 In making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592618 - 2022-11-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the jury’s finding. Id. (citation omitted). The jury, not the appellate court, is to “balance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74281 - 2014-09-15
the jury’s finding. Id. (citation omitted). The jury, not the appellate court, is to “balance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74281 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
after the circuit court failed to consider all relevant factors under the statute. Id., ¶¶31, 35-36, 40
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32993 - 2008-06-11
after the circuit court failed to consider all relevant factors under the statute. Id., ¶¶31, 35-36, 40
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32993 - 2008-06-11