Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42211 - 42220 of 57152 for id.
Search results 42211 - 42220 of 57152 for id.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
definitional meaning.” Id. “In construing or interpreting a statute the court is not at liberty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644620 - 2023-04-13
definitional meaning.” Id. “In construing or interpreting a statute the court is not at liberty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644620 - 2023-04-13
[PDF]
State v. Christopher A. Goodvine
” and it was made “‘in accordance with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.’” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7395 - 2017-09-20
” and it was made “‘in accordance with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.’” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7395 - 2017-09-20
2009 WI APP 40
-related statutes….” Id., ¶46. “Where statutory language is unambiguous,” we need not consult extrinsic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35480 - 2009-03-24
-related statutes….” Id., ¶46. “Where statutory language is unambiguous,” we need not consult extrinsic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35480 - 2009-03-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). The credibility of a witness is ordinarily a jury determination. Id. ¶16 To determine whether testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272887 - 2020-08-05
). The credibility of a witness is ordinarily a jury determination. Id. ¶16 To determine whether testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272887 - 2020-08-05
COURT OF APPEALS
id. We review the trial court’s summary denial of Sanders’s plea withdrawal motion as a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33960 - 2008-10-06
id. We review the trial court’s summary denial of Sanders’s plea withdrawal motion as a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33960 - 2008-10-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the [circuit] court erred.’” Id. (second alteration in original; citation omitted). AJ Petroleum cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995091 - 2025-08-12
that the [circuit] court erred.’” Id. (second alteration in original; citation omitted). AJ Petroleum cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995091 - 2025-08-12
COURT OF APPEALS
,” whether the parent exposed the child to a hazardous living environment. Id., ¶37. ¶8 “When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67803 - 2011-07-12
,” whether the parent exposed the child to a hazardous living environment. Id., ¶37. ¶8 “When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67803 - 2011-07-12
State v. Robert S. Martinez
the Informing the Accused form to the accused. Id. at 277-78. We further observed that, despite the better
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3173 - 2005-03-31
the Informing the Accused form to the accused. Id. at 277-78. We further observed that, despite the better
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3173 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
committed, is committing, or is about to commit an offense. Id., ¶¶10, 13 (citation omitted). “[I]f any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184846 - 2017-09-21
committed, is committing, or is about to commit an offense. Id., ¶¶10, 13 (citation omitted). “[I]f any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184846 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to prove one prong, we need not address the other. See id. at 697. ¶7 Rodriguez claims he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102086 - 2013-09-24
to prove one prong, we need not address the other. See id. at 697. ¶7 Rodriguez claims he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102086 - 2013-09-24