Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42221 - 42230 of 69145 for he.
Search results 42221 - 42230 of 69145 for he.
State v. Kevin L. Guibord
. The police officer testified that six days prior to this offense he contacted Guibord, who had been driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10774 - 2005-03-31
. The police officer testified that six days prior to this offense he contacted Guibord, who had been driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10774 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jerrold T. McGuire
with the trial court in which he was informed of the repeater allegations on each charge and their penalties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12848 - 2005-03-31
with the trial court in which he was informed of the repeater allegations on each charge and their penalties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12848 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Priest Williams
.2d 264, 266 (Ct. App. 1989). Here, Williams alleged in his motion that he did not receive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7772 - 2017-09-19
.2d 264, 266 (Ct. App. 1989). Here, Williams alleged in his motion that he did not receive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7772 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jerrold T. McGuire
with the trial court in which he was informed of the repeater allegations on each charge and their penalties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12849 - 2005-03-31
with the trial court in which he was informed of the repeater allegations on each charge and their penalties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12849 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kevin L. Guibord
is affirmed. The police officer testified that six days prior to this offense he contacted Guibord, who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10774 - 2017-09-20
is affirmed. The police officer testified that six days prior to this offense he contacted Guibord, who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10774 - 2017-09-20
State v. Michael A. Decker
concentration second offense in violation of Wis. Stat. ยง 346.63(1)(a) and (b). He contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7260 - 2005-03-31
concentration second offense in violation of Wis. Stat. ยง 346.63(1)(a) and (b). He contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7260 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Tom E. Scola
appeals from a judgment convicting him of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OMVWI). He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10648 - 2017-09-20
appeals from a judgment convicting him of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OMVWI). He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10648 - 2017-09-20
Jeffrey R. Hundt v. State Farm General Insurance Company.
, which he sustained by falling down a silo chute. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11176 - 2005-03-31
, which he sustained by falling down a silo chute. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11176 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Franklin G. Van Wormer
in the complaint for the first time in this, his second appeal. He also argues for the first time that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9909 - 2017-09-19
in the complaint for the first time in this, his second appeal. He also argues for the first time that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9909 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert Garel
Garel presented clear and convincing evidence of a new sentencing factor. We conclude that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16228 - 2005-03-31
Garel presented clear and convincing evidence of a new sentencing factor. We conclude that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16228 - 2005-03-31