Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42231 - 42240 of 59033 for do.
Search results 42231 - 42240 of 59033 for do.
[PDF]
NOTICE
, DeJesus-Torres argued that he pled guilty only because his attorney instructed him to do so. He stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33275 - 2014-09-15
, DeJesus-Torres argued that he pled guilty only because his attorney instructed him to do so. He stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33275 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 1, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of ...
] Because the appellant’s briefs refer to him as “Enciso,” we will do the same. [4] This matter started out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65145 - 2011-05-31
] Because the appellant’s briefs refer to him as “Enciso,” we will do the same. [4] This matter started out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65145 - 2011-05-31
CA Blank Order
nothing to do with the COMPAS scores. Although a circuit court’s disclaimer of reliance on identified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115626 - 2014-06-24
nothing to do with the COMPAS scores. Although a circuit court’s disclaimer of reliance on identified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115626 - 2014-06-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
into the statute a requirement that is not there, something it may not do. See State v. Zarnke, 224 Wis. 2d 116
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57072 - 2014-09-15
into the statute a requirement that is not there, something it may not do. See State v. Zarnke, 224 Wis. 2d 116
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57072 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
deference to the trier-of-fact and do not substitute our judgment unless the evidence, viewed most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194168 - 2017-10-09
deference to the trier-of-fact and do not substitute our judgment unless the evidence, viewed most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194168 - 2017-10-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2012, indicates that the court decided that issue and, in doing so, referenced specific findings from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108226 - 2017-09-21
, 2012, indicates that the court decided that issue and, in doing so, referenced specific findings from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108226 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert Glickman
expert witnesses, reminding him of his failure to do so. Attorney Glickman did not respond. ¶5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17123 - 2017-09-21
expert witnesses, reminding him of his failure to do so. Attorney Glickman did not respond. ¶5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17123 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Charles Newman
of the plea proceeding would have been different. The trial court disagreed, 5 and so do we. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6304 - 2017-09-19
of the plea proceeding would have been different. The trial court disagreed, 5 and so do we. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6304 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Steven D. Cathey
evidence Cathey offers would do nothing to impeach Angela’s testimony. We therefore conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15845 - 2017-09-21
evidence Cathey offers would do nothing to impeach Angela’s testimony. We therefore conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15845 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. Upon consideration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104013 - 2017-09-21
of the report, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. Upon consideration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104013 - 2017-09-21