Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42241 - 42250 of 82758 for case codes/1000.
Search results 42241 - 42250 of 82758 for case codes/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
on the State’s case … is not substantial.”[3] ¶5 The court concluded if it “were to grant an adjournment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36107 - 2009-04-06
on the State’s case … is not substantial.”[3] ¶5 The court concluded if it “were to grant an adjournment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36107 - 2009-04-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
there was insufficient evidence to prosecute the case. Jordan was not charged. The burglary referral was closed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104188 - 2017-09-21
there was insufficient evidence to prosecute the case. Jordan was not charged. The burglary referral was closed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104188 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Grych’s arguments and affirm the judgment and order. BACKGROUND ¶2 The charges in this case arose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149745 - 2017-09-21
Grych’s arguments and affirm the judgment and order. BACKGROUND ¶2 The charges in this case arose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149745 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1). We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476741 - 2022-01-25
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1). We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476741 - 2022-01-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion because he made a prima facie case that the circuit court failed to fulfill its mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136995 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion because he made a prima facie case that the circuit court failed to fulfill its mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136995 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Carol M. Oberbreckling v. Waterford Square Apartments
glaring deficiencies” in the plaintiff’s case for liability and notice: (1) no expert opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16339 - 2017-09-21
glaring deficiencies” in the plaintiff’s case for liability and notice: (1) no expert opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16339 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the family case manager, testified she had reminded C.L. of the court date, time and branch four days
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181977 - 2017-09-21
, the family case manager, testified she had reminded C.L. of the court date, time and branch four days
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181977 - 2017-09-21
Hacco, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
action or remand the case to the agency if we find that the action depends on any finding of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7695 - 2005-03-31
action or remand the case to the agency if we find that the action depends on any finding of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7695 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
Laumann’s pleas were entered in two trial court cases that proceeded in tandem and we granted Laumann’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29787 - 2014-09-15
Laumann’s pleas were entered in two trial court cases that proceeded in tandem and we granted Laumann’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29787 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kenneth E. Hanson
not be the sole determinant of probable cause in an operating while intoxicated case. But that is not what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9210 - 2005-03-31
not be the sole determinant of probable cause in an operating while intoxicated case. But that is not what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9210 - 2005-03-31