Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42241 - 42250 of 61771 for does.

OPINION 06-02 ISSUE ...
. This opinion does not purport to address provisions of the Code of Ethics of Public Officials and Employees
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26944 - 2006-10-24

COURT OF APPEALS
. The court’s consideration of the guidelines does not mean the guidelines affected its sentencing decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93402 - 2013-03-04

[PDF] State v. Thomas M. Crider
may not reoffend based on successful treatment.” The observation that he “may not reoffend” does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3961 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Linda R. Cauley
a federal bankruptcy court's determination does not preclude a state court prosecution under the doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8608 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Joseph T. Eells v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
, not those with the same occupation. While that decision uses the words "all employees," it does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8613 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Wayne M. Fredrich
“reasonable” discipline of a child. Inflicting a substantial bruise on a two-year-old child does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7310 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, show that Fink’s violations involved “methamphetamine.” This minor variance does not give rise
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353309 - 2021-04-07

[PDF] NOTICE
opening or reply briefs, and she does not reply to Wilcox’s argument that her claim is precluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35768 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] IW-1788 - Order for Extension of Dispositional Order/Consent Decree (Out-of-Home Placement Only) - Indian Child Welfare Act
together were made. not required because the child/juvenile does not have siblings in out-of-home
/formdisplay/IW-1788.pdf?formNumber=IW-1788&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-01-07

[PDF] Jimmy Bridges v. Gerald Berge
dismissed because the evidence supported the administrative decision. However, the respondent does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2761 - 2017-09-19