Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42261 - 42270 of 84318 for case number.
Search results 42261 - 42270 of 84318 for case number.
[PDF]
NOTICE
at the case, she found this statement in the court docket entries: “Jury question received, answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42498 - 2014-09-15
at the case, she found this statement in the court docket entries: “Jury question received, answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42498 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
Armstrong that “if a question invites a yes or no answer, it really helps the case speed along and helps
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41625 - 2014-09-15
Armstrong that “if a question invites a yes or no answer, it really helps the case speed along and helps
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41625 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
-defense cases, evidence of prior specific acts of violence by the victim is admissible only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28299 - 2007-03-05
-defense cases, evidence of prior specific acts of violence by the victim is admissible only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28299 - 2007-03-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to Intrastate Detainer cases; and (3) vacation of the DNA surcharge, fees and costs and restitution imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192635 - 2017-09-21
to Intrastate Detainer cases; and (3) vacation of the DNA surcharge, fees and costs and restitution imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192635 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“to testify about a similar type of issue” in another case. The court indicated it would permit Bailey’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985938 - 2025-07-23
“to testify about a similar type of issue” in another case. The court indicated it would permit Bailey’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985938 - 2025-07-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject Mineau’s arguments, and summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191642 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject Mineau’s arguments, and summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191642 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court also compared this case to State v. Dumstrey, 2016 WI 3, ¶10, 366 Wis. 2d 64, 873 N.W.2d 502
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255163 - 2020-02-27
court also compared this case to State v. Dumstrey, 2016 WI 3, ¶10, 366 Wis. 2d 64, 873 N.W.2d 502
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255163 - 2020-02-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Because it was undisputed that Marnika’s parental rights had been terminated in those cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46156 - 2014-09-15
. Because it was undisputed that Marnika’s parental rights had been terminated in those cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46156 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
2012 WI 8 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2011AP1700-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77946 - 2012-02-08
2012 WI 8 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2011AP1700-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77946 - 2012-02-08
State v. Brook Grzelak
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1454-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12501 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1454-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12501 - 2005-03-31