Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42291 - 42300 of 83431 for simple case search.
Search results 42291 - 42300 of 83431 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
, the reaffirmation agreement is not enforceable. ¶16 Bankruptcy cases that Attorney Duren cites further support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109596 - 2014-03-26
, the reaffirmation agreement is not enforceable. ¶16 Bankruptcy cases that Attorney Duren cites further support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109596 - 2014-03-26
[PDF]
General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. Donald A. Hills
Case No.: 95-2261 † Petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9532 - 2017-09-19
Case No.: 95-2261 † Petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9532 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Clayton Ganser v. Claudia Schwartz
the option void and dismissing Ganser’s complaint. The court later entered a final order in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12757 - 2017-09-21
the option void and dismissing Ganser’s complaint. The court later entered a final order in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12757 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Patricia O'Neil v. Monroe County Circuit Court
2003 WI App 149 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-2866
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5817 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 149 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-2866
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5817 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Gregg A. Pfaff
in this case, Gregg A. Pfaff, was also arrested for a felony—homicide by intoxicated use of a motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5407 - 2017-09-19
in this case, Gregg A. Pfaff, was also arrested for a felony—homicide by intoxicated use of a motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5407 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
in a separate case, were dismissed and read in for sentencing purposes.[4] ¶4 At the plea hearing, trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57466 - 2010-12-06
in a separate case, were dismissed and read in for sentencing purposes.[4] ¶4 At the plea hearing, trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57466 - 2010-12-06
COURT OF APPEALS
for reconsideration and suppressed the evidence. The court reasoned Bohman had “some impact” on this case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106915 - 2014-01-21
for reconsideration and suppressed the evidence. The court reasoned Bohman had “some impact” on this case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106915 - 2014-01-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the residual hearsay exception, WIS. STAT. § 908.03(24). Therefore, we summarily affirm. This case arose
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970274 - 2025-06-17
the residual hearsay exception, WIS. STAT. § 908.03(24). Therefore, we summarily affirm. This case arose
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970274 - 2025-06-17
[PDF]
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Neung S.
was unable to post bail and therefore remained incarcerated during the pendency of her case. As a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2203 - 2017-09-19
was unable to post bail and therefore remained incarcerated during the pendency of her case. As a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2203 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
this court that Humphrey had previously paid a DNA surcharge as part of a 2001 case. The question
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216043 - 2018-07-24
this court that Humphrey had previously paid a DNA surcharge as part of a 2001 case. The question
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216043 - 2018-07-24