Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4231 - 4240 of 29424 for er.

[PDF] Dolores Haas v. Thomas J. Berube
-discovered evidence would probably change the result, we conclude the circuit ourt erred by denying Haas’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2262 - 2017-09-19

State v. Marty S. Madeiros
court erred in finding that he had consented to have blood drawn for a chemical test and (2) permitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3069 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Judith L. Marshe v. Patrick B. Sheehan
that the court erred when it allowed the jury to see the videotape. Sheehan also argued that the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11114 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Gerald E. Lenzner v. Society Insurance
judgment. It contends that the trial court erred by awarding $1,500 to Gerald Lenzner when he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14484 - 2017-09-21

Northwoods Care Vans, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services
that decision. Northwoods contends that the circuit court erred by concluding that neither the hearing examiner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10860 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. David Thompson
claims that the trial court erred when it imposed sentences in this case to run consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10238 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea and suppress evidence. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190859 - 2017-09-21

Policemen Relief Association v. Linda L. Krueger
for summary judgment. The PRA claims the trial court erred when it concluded that Mrs. Krueger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11244 - 2005-03-31

State v. Gary L. DeMars
to submit to a test for intoxication. DeMars argues that the court erred in denying his motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5977 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
restitution under § 973.20, that the court erred when it entered an order for restitution without following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56533 - 2010-11-09