Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4231 - 4240 of 76892 for see.
Search results 4231 - 4240 of 76892 for see.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of first-degree reckless homicide. See WIS. STAT. § 940.02(1) (1999-2000).1 The circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94654 - 2014-09-15
of first-degree reckless homicide. See WIS. STAT. § 940.02(1) (1999-2000).1 The circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94654 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069548 - 2026-01-28
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069548 - 2026-01-28
CA Blank Order
. There is no arguable basis for challenging whether Moore’s plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95944 - 2013-04-22
. There is no arguable basis for challenging whether Moore’s plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95944 - 2013-04-22
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
a dangerous weapon, which increased his maximum exposure by five years. See WIS. STAT. § 939.63(1)(b
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97924 - 2014-09-15
a dangerous weapon, which increased his maximum exposure by five years. See WIS. STAT. § 939.63(1)(b
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97924 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
apply a highly deferential standard. See State v. Kimbrough, 2001 WI App 138, ¶12, 246 Wis. 2d 648
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641990 - 2023-04-11
apply a highly deferential standard. See State v. Kimbrough, 2001 WI App 138, ¶12, 246 Wis. 2d 648
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641990 - 2023-04-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
exist for an appeal. Therefore, we summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. On November 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=803639 - 2024-05-21
exist for an appeal. Therefore, we summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. On November 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=803639 - 2024-05-21
State v. David R. Messner
a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15622 - 2005-03-31
a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15622 - 2005-03-31
State v. Derrick E. Hopkins
to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4502 - 2005-03-31
to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4502 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Claude Lowery
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11834 - 2017-09-21
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11834 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no-contest plea was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered. See State v. Bangert, 131 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106473 - 2017-09-21
no-contest plea was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered. See State v. Bangert, 131 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106473 - 2017-09-21