Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4231 - 4240 of 6110 for sheriff.
Search results 4231 - 4240 of 6110 for sheriff.
COURT OF APPEALS
Sheriff’s Office, testified that he spoke with Moller on the day that a search warrant was executed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115434 - 2014-06-25
Sheriff’s Office, testified that he spoke with Moller on the day that a search warrant was executed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115434 - 2014-06-25
[PDF]
Bank of Sun Prairie v. Marshall Development Company
, the court entered an order in that action confirming the sheriff’s sale and directing a No. 00-1076
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2518 - 2017-09-19
, the court entered an order in that action confirming the sheriff’s sale and directing a No. 00-1076
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2518 - 2017-09-19
Frontsheet
. The Dunn County Sheriff's Department personally served Attorney Lamb with another letter from the OLR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75425 - 2011-12-19
. The Dunn County Sheriff's Department personally served Attorney Lamb with another letter from the OLR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75425 - 2011-12-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are not in dispute for purposes of this appeal. In September 2006, the Sauk County Sheriff’s Department executed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315754 - 2020-12-17
are not in dispute for purposes of this appeal. In September 2006, the Sauk County Sheriff’s Department executed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315754 - 2020-12-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” The court responded that the reality is that the policy of the sheriff’s department for in- custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265318 - 2020-06-23
.” The court responded that the reality is that the policy of the sheriff’s department for in- custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265318 - 2020-06-23
State v. Michael Newago
to deliver it. ¶16 A Bayfield County sheriff’s deputy testified that he stopped a car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20080 - 2005-10-26
to deliver it. ¶16 A Bayfield County sheriff’s deputy testified that he stopped a car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20080 - 2005-10-26
COURT OF APPEALS
to the Price County Sheriff’s Department. ¶36 “The fundamental requirements of procedural due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143754 - 2015-06-29
to the Price County Sheriff’s Department. ¶36 “The fundamental requirements of procedural due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143754 - 2015-06-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 135 (1952) (applying statute to sheriff who was on the road for work); see also Neese v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248701 - 2019-10-16
N.W.2d 135 (1952) (applying statute to sheriff who was on the road for work); see also Neese v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248701 - 2019-10-16
State v. Jason R. Dixon
with Heintz, or being at or near her home. On March 4, 2001, a sheriff’s deputy found Dixon and Heinz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5327 - 2005-03-31
with Heintz, or being at or near her home. On March 4, 2001, a sheriff’s deputy found Dixon and Heinz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5327 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 108
sheriff, relating to the jail personnel's treatment of J.H. while confined in the Marathon County jail
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54030 - 2014-09-15
sheriff, relating to the jail personnel's treatment of J.H. while confined in the Marathon County jail
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54030 - 2014-09-15