Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4231 - 4240 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 4231 - 4240 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
for postconviction relief. Morgan argues that the trial court erred when it: (1) denied his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34977 - 2014-09-15
for postconviction relief. Morgan argues that the trial court erred when it: (1) denied his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34977 - 2014-09-15
State v. Randolph P. Haushalter
of an intoxicant (OWI), contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), Stats. Haushalter argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15124 - 2005-03-31
of an intoxicant (OWI), contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), Stats. Haushalter argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15124 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-12). 1 He contends that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150640 - 2017-09-21
-12). 1 He contends that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150640 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
to a new trial because: (1) of newly-discovered evidence; and (2) his attorneys, both trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28401 - 2007-03-12
to a new trial because: (1) of newly-discovered evidence; and (2) his attorneys, both trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28401 - 2007-03-12
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. Morgan argues that the trial court erred when it: (1) denied his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34977 - 2008-12-22
for postconviction relief. Morgan argues that the trial court erred when it: (1) denied his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34977 - 2008-12-22
State v. Roger P. Barber
.[1] He also appeals from the trial court’s orders denying his motions for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13447 - 2005-03-31
.[1] He also appeals from the trial court’s orders denying his motions for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13447 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Brash, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jeffrey Harris, pro se, appeals from a trial court order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160938 - 2017-09-21
and Brash, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jeffrey Harris, pro se, appeals from a trial court order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160938 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Steven Buckingham
Buckingham also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motions for plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12409 - 2014-09-15
Buckingham also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motions for plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12409 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Duran Thomas
is unconstitutional. Further, he submits that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2460 - 2017-09-19
is unconstitutional. Further, he submits that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2460 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael R. Cooper
Cooper also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5586 - 2017-09-19
Cooper also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5586 - 2017-09-19