Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42321 - 42330 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
Search results 42321 - 42330 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
07AP1521 State v. Tyler J.K.
trial should not be weighed against him. Finally, Tyler also claims that the delay was prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31564 - 2008-01-22
trial should not be weighed against him. Finally, Tyler also claims that the delay was prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31564 - 2008-01-22
Cindy Brenengen v. Brian D. Brenengen
partner. Regarding this first assertion, he claims the court erred by: (1) finding that he would not sell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14064 - 2005-03-31
partner. Regarding this first assertion, he claims the court erred by: (1) finding that he would not sell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14064 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
four counts in the first trial and eight of the twelve counts in the second trial.[1] Welch claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33051 - 2008-06-16
four counts in the first trial and eight of the twelve counts in the second trial.[1] Welch claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33051 - 2008-06-16
COURT OF APPEALS
to the effective assistance of counsel. We disagree. To prove an ineffective assistance of counsel claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107272 - 2014-01-28
to the effective assistance of counsel. We disagree. To prove an ineffective assistance of counsel claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107272 - 2014-01-28
State v. Anthony J. Randle
the judgment and withdraw his plea. Randle claims: (1) the trial court erred in ruling that he waived his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4020 - 2005-03-31
the judgment and withdraw his plea. Randle claims: (1) the trial court erred in ruling that he waived his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4020 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Brown County v. Rochelle D.
two of the three petition grounds that did not have a factual basis. Consequently, he claims he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3427 - 2017-09-19
two of the three petition grounds that did not have a factual basis. Consequently, he claims he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3427 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
decision to deny No. 2011AP2899 2 David A. Walter’s claim for unemployment insurance benefits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86918 - 2014-09-15
decision to deny No. 2011AP2899 2 David A. Walter’s claim for unemployment insurance benefits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86918 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Joshua Slagoski
when we consider Slagoski’s Fifth and Sixth Amendment claims. For now we simply note that, in our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2690 - 2017-09-19
when we consider Slagoski’s Fifth and Sixth Amendment claims. For now we simply note that, in our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2690 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
forth a claim for relief as well as a material issue of fact. Id. Second, the court must determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33537 - 2008-09-29
forth a claim for relief as well as a material issue of fact. Id. Second, the court must determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33537 - 2008-09-29
State v. Winnebago County
the landowners from securing the highest and best use of the parcel. The State alternatively claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8338 - 2005-03-31
the landowners from securing the highest and best use of the parcel. The State alternatively claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8338 - 2005-03-31