Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42331 - 42340 of 83180 for case search.
Search results 42331 - 42340 of 83180 for case search.
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James W. Bannen
2002 WI 117 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 01-3055-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16565 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI 117 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 01-3055-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16565 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124783 - 2014-10-16
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124783 - 2014-10-16
City of Wautoma v. David H. Jansen
of the Wautoma city ordinances. He argues that: (1) his case was illegally tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9249 - 2005-03-31
of the Wautoma city ordinances. He argues that: (1) his case was illegally tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9249 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sheila McK.
) (only dispositive issue need be addressed). I. ¶2 This is an horrendous case. Aundre was born
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20309 - 2007-06-04
) (only dispositive issue need be addressed). I. ¶2 This is an horrendous case. Aundre was born
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20309 - 2007-06-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
a sentencing hearing. Prior to McGowan’s sentencing, his case was transferred to the Honorable Marc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41512 - 2014-09-15
a sentencing hearing. Prior to McGowan’s sentencing, his case was transferred to the Honorable Marc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41512 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
on the facts of a given case is a question of law which we review independently of the trial court.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37252 - 2014-09-15
on the facts of a given case is a question of law which we review independently of the trial court.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37252 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and river were the source of the contamination. ¶3 The owners petitioned for a contested case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94669 - 2013-04-02
and river were the source of the contamination. ¶3 The owners petitioned for a contested case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94669 - 2013-04-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745130 - 2023-12-27
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745130 - 2023-12-27
[PDF]
Winnebago County v. Paul M. Nigl
). In his case, we could relabel his petition as either a direct appeal or a postconviction motion under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6651 - 2017-09-20
). In his case, we could relabel his petition as either a direct appeal or a postconviction motion under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6651 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
never had nor transferred an interest in Teale’s mortgage to US Bank. ¶7 This case depends on our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79436 - 2012-03-12
never had nor transferred an interest in Teale’s mortgage to US Bank. ¶7 This case depends on our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79436 - 2012-03-12