Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42351 - 42360 of 59277 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] Allan J. Payleitner v. Timothy I. Mac Gillis
. In response, Mac Gillis wrote a letter to Allan in which he claimed that the payments he had made to Lillian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16132 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Gary L. Parson
could not credibly claim to be unaffected No. 97-0116-CR 4 by these relationships.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11953 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
it the appropriate weight. ¶17 At the hearing, Attorney Hammis claimed that he had in fact paid the court costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135152 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Eugene W.
)(b). If the defendant claims to be incompetent, the State bears the burden of proving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4330 - 2017-09-19

Mary Judith Johnson v. Robert R. Johnson
and Judith, this property was placed on the market for sale before the divorce hearing. Robert claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14610 - 2005-03-31

State v. Andres DelReal
postconviction motion. DelReal claims that the trial court erred in ruling on the admissibility of certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12512 - 2013-11-11

COURT OF APPEALS
constitutional claims). ¶18 Although Bloecher waived his right to challenge the complaint, we nevertheless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42294 - 2009-10-20

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 20, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cou...
, arguing that his sentence was unduly harsh compared to that of his co-defendant who Deal claims shot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71073 - 2011-09-19

07AP1521 State v. Tyler J.K.
trial should not be weighed against him. Finally, Tyler also claims that the delay was prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31564 - 2008-01-22

Tee & Bee, Inc. v. City of West Allis
of the hearing, claiming that it violated § 68.11, Stats. Specifically, Tee & Bee contended that allowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11161 - 2005-03-31