Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42351 - 42360 of 98491 for court records search online.
Search results 42351 - 42360 of 98491 for court records search online.
[PDF]
NOTICE
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 21, 2007 David R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29452 - 2014-09-15
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 21, 2007 David R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29452 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Gerold A. Haut
on the grounds it was without basis in the record. The circuit court denied his motion and this court affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7449 - 2017-09-20
on the grounds it was without basis in the record. The circuit court denied his motion and this court affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7449 - 2017-09-20
State v. Gerold A. Haut
sought to withdraw his plea on the grounds it was without basis in the record. The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7449 - 2005-03-31
sought to withdraw his plea on the grounds it was without basis in the record. The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7449 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 18
by the record. Accordingly, we reverse the circuit court’s order affirming LIRC’s decision and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183375 - 2017-09-21
by the record. Accordingly, we reverse the circuit court’s order affirming LIRC’s decision and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183375 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Action Law v. Habush
] to the Trial Court for the determination as the finder of fact based solely on [the existing record]." Since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11251 - 2017-09-19
] to the Trial Court for the determination as the finder of fact based solely on [the existing record]." Since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11251 - 2017-09-19
Action Law v. Habush
on [the existing record]." Since the trial court had already concluded that the case could not be decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11251 - 2005-03-31
on [the existing record]." Since the trial court had already concluded that the case could not be decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11251 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Duran Thomas
it, but did agree to include the motion in the record. The court then proceeded to sentencing. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2460 - 2017-09-19
it, but did agree to include the motion in the record. The court then proceeded to sentencing. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2460 - 2017-09-19
State v. Duran Thomas
, refused to hear it, but did agree to include the motion in the record. The court then proceeded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2460 - 2005-03-31
, refused to hear it, but did agree to include the motion in the record. The court then proceeded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2460 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David Sanchez
review of the record supports the trial court’s assessment that clear and convincing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7221 - 2017-09-20
review of the record supports the trial court’s assessment that clear and convincing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7221 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. James I. Montroy
, as the court here acknowledged on the record, a sentencing court is not bound by the PSI’s sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19432 - 2017-09-21
, as the court here acknowledged on the record, a sentencing court is not bound by the PSI’s sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19432 - 2017-09-21