Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42381 - 42390 of 84303 for case number.
Search results 42381 - 42390 of 84303 for case number.
[PDF]
State v. Raymond L. Matzker
to § 980.05, STATS., and committing him to a secure mental health facility (court of appeals case No. 94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10096 - 2017-09-19
to § 980.05, STATS., and committing him to a secure mental health facility (court of appeals case No. 94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10096 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 76
2014 WI APP 76 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2013AP1481
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114877 - 2017-09-21
2014 WI APP 76 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2013AP1481
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114877 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Town of Caledonia
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9751 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9751 - 2017-09-19
State v. Curtis M. Agacki
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-3463-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13317 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-3463-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13317 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The case proceeded to a jury trial. The jury found in favor of New Glarus. Following entry of judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83071 - 2014-09-15
The case proceeded to a jury trial. The jury found in favor of New Glarus. Following entry of judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83071 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 165
2009 WI APP 165 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2008AP2861
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42630 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 165 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2008AP2861
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42630 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
explanation of a sentence varies from case to case. Gallion, 270 Wis. 2d 535, ¶39. ¶25 We also review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81719 - 2012-05-17
explanation of a sentence varies from case to case. Gallion, 270 Wis. 2d 535, ¶39. ¶25 We also review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81719 - 2012-05-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2009-10) (as an appeal of a case “under s. 343.305”). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66885 - 2014-09-15
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2009-10) (as an appeal of a case “under s. 343.305”). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66885 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, and Schoh does not argue that this technical defect, if it is one, matters.[3] ¶6 The case proceeded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83071 - 2012-05-30
, and Schoh does not argue that this technical defect, if it is one, matters.[3] ¶6 The case proceeded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83071 - 2012-05-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, is unconstitutional as applied to the facts of her case. ¶9 The factual basis for Mareza L.’s motion was her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109726 - 2017-09-21
, is unconstitutional as applied to the facts of her case. ¶9 The factual basis for Mareza L.’s motion was her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109726 - 2017-09-21