Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42381 - 42390 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 42381 - 42390 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Edward Parker
motion for postconviction relief. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11074 - 2017-09-19
motion for postconviction relief. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11074 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Peggy A. Hampton
)(a), STATS. Hampton claims that the circuit court erred by failing to suppress the results of field
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15243 - 2017-09-21
)(a), STATS. Hampton claims that the circuit court erred by failing to suppress the results of field
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15243 - 2017-09-21
State v. Davina A. Pierce
and the theft charge was based on the State’s claim that she had falsified weekly “time cards” while working
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14937 - 2005-03-31
and the theft charge was based on the State’s claim that she had falsified weekly “time cards” while working
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14937 - 2005-03-31
Margaret Barber v. Carole Barber Stoviak
. Later that year, Carole filed a lawsuit against Margaret claiming prescriptive rights to certain lands
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3937 - 2005-03-31
. Later that year, Carole filed a lawsuit against Margaret claiming prescriptive rights to certain lands
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3937 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Alonzo Peavy
.2d 302, 414 N.W.2d 626 (1987). In Gomaz, a defendant claimed she held a knife in front of her when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8381 - 2017-09-19
.2d 302, 414 N.W.2d 626 (1987). In Gomaz, a defendant claimed she held a knife in front of her when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8381 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for summary judgment, arguing, as relevant here, that Rice’s claims should be dismissed because the program
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984590 - 2025-07-17
for summary judgment, arguing, as relevant here, that Rice’s claims should be dismissed because the program
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984590 - 2025-07-17
George M. Reynolds v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
and storage facility, and the DNR's decision conditionally approving the application. Reynolds claims an EIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9466 - 2005-03-31
and storage facility, and the DNR's decision conditionally approving the application. Reynolds claims an EIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9466 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. Stat. §§ 767.27 and 767.263 (2003-04).[2] He claims that he cannot be held in contempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121307 - 2014-09-09
Wis. Stat. §§ 767.27 and 767.263 (2003-04).[2] He claims that he cannot be held in contempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121307 - 2014-09-09
[PDF]
State v. Sandra K.T.
. We disagree with both of her claims and affirm. We begin with a summary of the State's evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10703 - 2017-09-20
. We disagree with both of her claims and affirm. We begin with a summary of the State's evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10703 - 2017-09-20
Frontsheet
that while Attorney Davison claimed the case was still under appeal, on cross-examination he revealed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45391 - 2010-01-06
that while Attorney Davison claimed the case was still under appeal, on cross-examination he revealed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45391 - 2010-01-06